Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.1 Codex Max vs Claude Opus 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-5.1 Codex Max vs Claude Opus 5.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-5.1 Codex Max da OpenAI e Claude Opus 5.5 da Anthropic são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O GPT-5.1 Codex Max oferece uma janela de contexto de 400K tokens a $1.75/$14.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Claude Opus 5.5 oferece 1M tokens de contexto a $4.00/$20.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex Max

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O GPT-5.1 Codex Max da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 400K, velocidade de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 62/10

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$1.75 / 1M

Output Token:

$14.00 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

78.2%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Claude Opus 5.5 da Anthropic é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 78 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 94/100

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

84.6%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • GPT-5.1 Codex Max is 1.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window (1M vs 400K tokens).
  • GPT-5.1 Codex Max is faster at 95 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 78.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-5.1 Codex MaxClaude Opus 5.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6294
Provider
OpenAIAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.75 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$14.00 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.87 / 1M$3.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
95 tok/s78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
78.2%84.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
80%82.3%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.17 / 1M$0.40 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5.5
+6.4% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-5.1 Codex Max
1.6x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-5.1 Codex Max
+22% faster generation
Context
Claude Opus 5.5
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.1 Codex MaxClaude Opus 5.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

78.2%vs84.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

80%vs82.3%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

87.2%vs91.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1378ptsvs1507pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

13.2%vs19.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

54.5%vs66.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

48.5%vs58.7%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

75.5%vs83.1%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

92.6%vs95.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80%vs92.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

95 tok/s vs78 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5.1 Codex Max1.70s
Claude Opus 5.51.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5.1 Codex Max6.96s
Claude Opus 5.57.81s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5.1 Codex Max Monthly API Bill
$15.49 / month
$1.75/1M in · $14/1M out
Claude Opus 5.5 Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
GPT-5.1 Codex Max saves approximately $9.11 / month (37%) under this workload.1.6x Savings

GPT-5.1 Codex Max · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 400K com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 78.2% · GPQA Diamond 80%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 95 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1700 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($1.75/$14 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 84.6% · GPQA Diamond 82.3%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 78 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1400 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($4/$20 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5.1 Codex MaxClaude Opus 5.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.40$3.85
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
62K68K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
36K42K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-5.1 Codex MaxClaude Opus 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-1-codex-maxclaude-opus-5-5-20260901
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2025-112026-09
Knowledge CutoffOctober 2024June 2026
ArchitectureMaximum-capability code-specialised reasoning modelExtended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.75/1M in) across full 400K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.175/1M (no extra cache-write fee)$0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5.1 Codex Max vs Claude Opus 5.5: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.1 Codex Max or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 62 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5.1 Codex Max is faster, generating 95 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-5.1 Codex Max is cheaper at $1.87 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude Opus 5.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.40s compared with 1.70s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 400K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto GPT-5.1 Codex Max (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Claude Opus 5.5 (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Claude Opus 5.5 lidera em inteligência geral e programação, GPT-5.1 Codex Max oferece geração mais rápida e GPT-5.1 Codex Max apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, GPT-5.1 Codex Max ou Claude Opus 5.5?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Claude Opus 5.5 leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, GPT-5.1 Codex Max ou Claude Opus 5.5?+

O GPT-5.1 Codex Max custa $1.75 / $14.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Claude Opus 5.5 custa $4.00 / $20.00. No custo combinado, GPT-5.1 Codex Max é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O GPT-5.1 Codex Max suporta 400K tokens de contexto contra 1M tokens do Claude Opus 5.5, enquanto GPT-5.1 Codex Max entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da OpenAI e Anthropic e benchmarks independentes (2026).