Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B da NVIDIA e Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B da NVIDIA são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B oferece uma janela de contexto de 256K tokens a $0.10/$0.25 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B oferece 262.1K tokens de contexto a $0.10/$0.25 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B

Raciocínio de Pesos Abertos

O Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B da NVIDIA é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio em cadeia de pensamento com pesos abertos e alta eficiência, oferecendo janela de contexto de 256K, velocidade de 155 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 46/

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

39.5%

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B da NVIDIA é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 262K, velocidade de 130 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 4

Intelligence Index45 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

38%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a larger context window (262K vs 256K tokens).
  • Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is faster at 155 tok/s vs 130 tok/s.
  • Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B leads on SWE-bench coding (39.5% vs 38.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4645
Provider
NVIDIANVIDIA
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.10 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.25 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.06 / 1M$0.06 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K16K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
155 tok/s130 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
39.5%38%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
55.2%54%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$0.02 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B
+1.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Tied
Identical monthly runtime cost
Speed
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B
+19% faster generation
Context
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
262.1K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

39.5%vs38%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

55.2%vs54%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

76%vs75%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1295ptsvs1285pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

35%vs34%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

65%vs64%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

77%vs76%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

155 tok/s vs130 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B0.27s
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B0.32s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B3.50s
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B4.17s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B Monthly API Bill
$0.41 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.25/1M out
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Monthly API Bill
$0.41 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.25/1M out
These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 256K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 39.5% · GPQA Diamond 55.2%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 155 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 270 ms
  • Pesos abertos (30B (3B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 262K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 38% · GPQA Diamond 54%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 130 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 320 ms
  • Pesos abertos (30B (3B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.11$0.12
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
28K28K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
11K10K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Official API Model ID (SDK)nemotron-cascade-2-30b-a3bnemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-032025-12
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026October 2025
ArchitectureCascaded Speculative MoE (30B Total / 3B Active)Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (30B Total / 3B Active)
Parameters30B (3B active MoE)30B (3B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 256K windowFlat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 262K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.02/1M tokensCached input at $0.02/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 65 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 65 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is more intelligent. It scores 46 compared with 45 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is faster, generating 155 tokens per second compared with 130 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.27s compared with 0.32s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 256K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B (Indicado para raciocínio em cadeia de pensamento com pesos abertos e alta eficiência, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B oferece geração mais rápida e Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B ou Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B ou Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?+

O Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B custa $0.10 / $0.25 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B custa $0.10 / $0.25. No custo combinado, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B suporta 256K tokens de contexto contra 262.1K tokens do Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, enquanto Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da NVIDIA e NVIDIA e benchmarks independentes (2026).