Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Mistral Small 4

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Mistral Small 4: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B da NVIDIA e Mistral Small 4 da Mistral AI são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B oferece uma janela de contexto de 256K tokens a $0.10/$0.25 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Mistral Small 4 oferece 256K tokens de contexto a $0.10/$0.30 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B

Raciocínio de Pesos Abertos

O Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B da NVIDIA é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio em cadeia de pensamento com pesos abertos e alta eficiência, oferecendo janela de contexto de 256K, velocidade de 155 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 46/

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

39.5%

Mistral AI

Mistral Small 4

Inferência Ultrarrápida

O Mistral Small 4 da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para respostas em tempo real com latência ultrabaixa e roteamento de alto volume, oferecendo janela de contexto de 256K, velocidade de 120 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 48/10

Intelligence Index48 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

44.5%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is 1.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is faster at 155 tok/s vs 120 tok/s.
  • Mistral Small 4 leads on SWE-bench coding (44.5% vs 39.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BMistral Small 4
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4648
Provider
NVIDIAMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.10 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.06 / 1M$0.07 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K16K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
155 tok/s120 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
39.5%44.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
55.2%56%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$0.03 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Mistral Small 4
+5.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B
1.1x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B
+29% faster generation
Context
Tied
256K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BMistral Small 4
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

39.5%vs44.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

55.2%vs56%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

76%vs78%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1295ptsvs1315pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

35%vs38%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

65%vs66%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

77%vs80%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

155 tok/s vs120 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B0.27s
Mistral Small 40.34s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B3.50s
Mistral Small 44.51s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B Monthly API Bill
$0.41 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.25/1M out
Mistral Small 4 Monthly API Bill
$0.47 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.3/1M out
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B saves approximately $0.06 / month (13%) under this workload.1.1x Savings

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 256K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 39.5% · GPQA Diamond 55.2%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 155 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 270 ms
  • Pesos abertos (30B (3B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Mistral Small 4 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 256K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 44.5% · GPQA Diamond 56%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 120 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 340 ms
  • Pesos abertos (24B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BMistral Small 4
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.11$0.12
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
28K28K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
11K12K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BMistral Small 4
Official API Model ID (SDK)nemotron-cascade-2-30b-a3bmistral-small-4-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-032026-03
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026January 2026
ArchitectureCascaded Speculative MoE (30B Total / 3B Active)Next-Gen Compact Multimodal Transformer
Parameters30B (3B active MoE)24B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 256K windowFlat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 256K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.02/1M tokensCached input at $0.03/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 65 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 15 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 52 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Mistral Small 4: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B or Mistral Small 4?

Mistral Small 4 is more intelligent. It scores 48 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is faster, generating 155 tokens per second compared with 120 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.06 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.07 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.27s compared with 0.34s.

Veredito

Tanto Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B (Indicado para raciocínio em cadeia de pensamento com pesos abertos e alta eficiência, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Mistral Small 4 (Indicado para respostas em tempo real com latência ultrabaixa e roteamento de alto volume, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Mistral Small 4 lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B oferece geração mais rápida e Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B ou Mistral Small 4?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Mistral Small 4 leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B ou Mistral Small 4?+

O Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B custa $0.10 / $0.25 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Mistral Small 4 custa $0.10 / $0.30. No custo combinado, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B suporta 256K tokens de contexto contra 256K tokens do Mistral Small 4, enquanto Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da NVIDIA e Mistral AI e benchmarks independentes (2026).