Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Opus 4.7: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 da Meta e Claude Opus 4.7 da Anthropic são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Muse Spark 1.1 oferece uma janela de contexto de 1M tokens a $3.00/$15.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Claude Opus 4.7 oferece 1M tokens de contexto a $5.00/$25.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Meta

Muse Spark 1.1

IA Multimodal Nativa

O Muse Spark 1.1 da Meta é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 105 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 90/100 e ta

Intelligence Index90 / 100
Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.5%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Claude Opus 4.7 da Anthropic é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 58 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 66/100

Intelligence Index66 / 100
Input Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$25.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

79.5%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Muse Spark 1.1 is 1.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Muse Spark 1.1 is faster at 105 tok/s vs 58 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 leads on SWE-bench coding (79.5% vs 76.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureMuse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 4.7
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9066
Provider
MetaAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$3.00 / 1M$5.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$15.00 / 1M$25.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$2.31 / 1M$3.85 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
64K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
105 tok/s58 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
76.5%79.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
83.5%77.8%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.30 / 1M$0.50 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 4.7
+3.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Muse Spark 1.1
1.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Muse Spark 1.1
+81% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Muse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 4.7
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

76.5%vs79.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

83.5%vs77.8%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88%vs89%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1495ptsvs1405pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs52.8%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

105 tok/s vs58 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Muse Spark 1.10.60s
Claude Opus 4.71.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Muse Spark 1.15.36s
Claude Opus 4.710.47s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Muse Spark 1.1 Monthly API Bill
$18.45 / month
$3/1M in · $15/1M out
Claude Opus 4.7 Monthly API Bill
$30.75 / month
$5/1M in · $25/1M out
Muse Spark 1.1 saves approximately $12.30 / month (40%) under this workload.1.7x Savings

Muse Spark 1.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 64K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 76.5% · GPQA Diamond 83.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 105 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 600 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($3/$15 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Claude Opus 4.7 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 79.5% · GPQA Diamond 77.8%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 58 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1850 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($5/$25 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMuse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 4.7
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.20$5.49
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
45K72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
22K37K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureMuse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 4.7
Official API Model ID (SDK)meta-llama/Muse-Spark-1.1claude-opus-4-7-20260401
API ProtocolMeta REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2026-042026-04
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026February 2026
ArchitectureOmni-modal native thinking agent architectureAdaptive Enterprise Reasoning Transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($3/1M in) across full 1000K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.3/1M tokens$0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationMeta Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, video, audiotext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Opus 4.7: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Muse Spark 1.1 or Claude Opus 4.7?

Muse Spark 1.1 is more intelligent. It scores 90 compared with 66 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Muse Spark 1.1 is faster, generating 105 tokens per second compared with 58 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper at $2.31 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Muse Spark 1.1 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.60s compared with 1.85s.

Veredito

Tanto Muse Spark 1.1 (Indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Claude Opus 4.7 (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Muse Spark 1.1 lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Muse Spark 1.1 oferece geração mais rápida e Muse Spark 1.1 apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Muse Spark 1.1 ou Claude Opus 4.7?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Muse Spark 1.1 leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Muse Spark 1.1 ou Claude Opus 4.7?+

O Muse Spark 1.1 custa $3.00 / $15.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Claude Opus 4.7 custa $5.00 / $25.00. No custo combinado, Muse Spark 1.1 é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Muse Spark 1.1 suporta 1M tokens de contexto contra 1M tokens do Claude Opus 4.7, enquanto Muse Spark 1.1 entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Meta e Anthropic e benchmarks independentes (2026).