Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Llama 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial

Partilhar

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Llama 5Profile

Muse Spark 1.1Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Llama 5

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Llama 5 da Meta é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 5M, velocidade de 65 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 94/100 e tarifa de ace

Intelligence Index94 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

5M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74%

Muse Spark 1.1

IA Multimodal Nativa

O Muse Spark 1.1 da Meta é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 105 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 90/100 e ta

Intelligence Index90 / 100

Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.5%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

Llama 5 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 1M tokens).
Muse Spark 1.1 is faster at 105 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
Muse Spark 1.1 leads on SWE-bench coding (76.5% vs 74.0%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Llama 5	Muse Spark 1.1
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	94	90
Provider	Meta	Meta
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$3.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$15.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$2.31 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	128K	64K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	65 tok/s	105 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	74%	76.5%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	84%	83.5%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.30 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Muse Spark 1.1

+2.5% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Llama 5

1.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Muse Spark 1.1

+62% faster generation

Context

Llama 5

5M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Llama 5Muse Spark 1.1

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

74%vs76.5%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

84%vs83.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

87%vs88%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1485ptsvs1495pts

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

68%vsN/A

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

88%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs105 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Llama 50.85s

Muse Spark 1.10.60s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Llama 58.54s

Muse Spark 1.15.36s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Llama 5 Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Muse Spark 1.1 Monthly API Bill

$18.45 / month

$3/1M in · $15/1M out

Llama 5 saves approximately $18.45 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 5M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 74% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 65 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 850 ms
Pesos abertos (600B+ total (~40-80B )) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Muse Spark 1.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 64K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 76.5% · GPQA Diamond 83.5%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 105 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 600 ms
Economia de API competitiva ($3/$15 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas

Considerations & Trade-offs

Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Llama 5	Muse Spark 1.1
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$2.20
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	40K	45K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	20K	22K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Llama 5	Muse Spark 1.1
Official API Model ID (SDK)	meta-llama/Llama-5	meta-llama/Muse-Spark-1.1
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	Meta REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date	2026-04	2026-04
Knowledge Cutoff	January 2026	January 2026
Architecture	Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active)	Omni-modal native thinking agent architecture
Parameters	600B+ total (~40-80B active)	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Flat rate ($3/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Cached input at $0.3/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Meta Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision, video, audio	text, vision, video, audio
Output Modalities	text	text

Llama 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Llama 5 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 90 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Muse Spark 1.1 is faster, generating 105 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 5 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.31 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Muse Spark 1.1 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.60s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Llama 5 (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Muse Spark 1.1 (Indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Llama 5 lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Muse Spark 1.1 oferece geração mais rápida e Llama 5 apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Llama 5 ou Muse Spark 1.1?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Llama 5 leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Llama 5 ou Muse Spark 1.1?+

O Llama 5 custa $0.00 / $0.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Muse Spark 1.1 custa $3.00 / $15.00. No custo combinado, Llama 5 é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Llama 5 suporta 5M tokens de contexto contra 1M tokens do Muse Spark 1.1, enquanto Muse Spark 1.1 entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Llama 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Llama 5

Muse Spark 1.1

Quem vence em cada categoria?

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Muse Spark 1.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Especificações Técnicas

Llama 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Veredito

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Related reading