Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial

Partilhar

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

GLM-4.7-FlashXProfile

Qwen3.5 122B-A10BProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Zhipu AI

GLM-4.7-FlashX

Modelo Leve e Econômico

O GLM-4.7-FlashX da Zhipu AI é um modelo de IA projetado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 200K, velocidade de 150 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 76/100 e tarifa de

Intelligence Index76 / 100

Input Token:

$0.02 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.04 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Alibaba

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

IA Multimodal Nativa

O Qwen3.5 122B-A10B da Alibaba é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 262K, velocidade de 78 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 82/1

Intelligence Index82 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has a larger context window (262K vs 200K tokens).
GLM-4.7-FlashX is faster at 150 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	GLM-4.7-FlashX	Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	76	82
Provider	Zhipu AI	Alibaba
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.02 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.04 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.01 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text	262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	8K	16K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	150 tok/s	78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	N/A	N/A
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	N/A	65.5%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

1.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

GLM-4.7-FlashX

+92% faster generation

Context

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

262.1K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GLM-4.7-FlashXQwen3.5 122B-A10B

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

N/Avs65.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74.5%vs80.5%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1290ptsvs1350pts

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

150 tok/s vs78 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

GLM-4.7-FlashX0.26s

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B0.51s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

GLM-4.7-FlashX3.59s

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B6.92s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

GLM-4.7-FlashX Monthly API Bill

$0.07 / month

$0.02/1M in · $0.04/1M out

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B saves approximately $0.07 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GLM-4.7-FlashX · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 200K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (MMLU-Pro 74.5% · Arena Elo 1290)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 150 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 260 ms
Pesos abertos para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 262K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (GPQA Diamond 65.5% · MMLU-Pro 80.5%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 78 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 510 ms
Pesos abertos (122B total (10B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	GLM-4.7-FlashX	Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.01	$0.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	13K	18K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	1K	5K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	GLM-4.7-FlashX	Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Official API Model ID (SDK)	glm-4-7-flashx	qwen3-5-122b-a10b-instruct
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2026-01	2026-02
Knowledge Cutoff	November 2025	December 2025
Architecture	Enhanced Latency-Optimized Transformer	Efficient Open Multimodal MoE Transformer
Parameters	Confidential	122B total (10B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.02/1M in) across full 200K window	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Cached input at $0.003/1M tokens	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 76 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 262 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GLM-4.7-FlashX or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is more intelligent. It scores 82 compared with 76 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GLM-4.7-FlashX is faster, generating 150 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.01 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GLM-4.7-FlashX has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.26s compared with 0.51s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 200K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto GLM-4.7-FlashX (Indicado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (Indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Qwen3.5 122B-A10B lidera em inteligência geral e programação, GLM-4.7-FlashX oferece geração mais rápida e Qwen3.5 122B-A10B apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, GLM-4.7-FlashX ou Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, GLM-4.7-FlashX ou Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?+

O GLM-4.7-FlashX custa $0.02 / $0.04 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Qwen3.5 122B-A10B custa $0.00 / $0.00. No custo combinado, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O GLM-4.7-FlashX suporta 200K tokens de contexto contra 262.1K tokens do Qwen3.5 122B-A10B, enquanto GLM-4.7-FlashX entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

GLM-4.7-FlashX

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Quem vence em cada categoria?

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

GLM-4.7-FlashX · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Especificações Técnicas

GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Veredito

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Related reading