Head-to-Head Model Comparison

ERNIE 4.5 vs QwQ Plus

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial

Partilhar

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

ERNIE 4.5Profile

QwQ PlusProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Baidu

ERNIE 4.5

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O ERNIE 4.5 da Baidu é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 75 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 81/100 e tarif

Intelligence Index81 / 100

Input Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.40 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Alibaba

QwQ Plus

Motor de Raciocínio Profundo

O QwQ Plus da Alibaba é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, oferecendo janela de contexto de 131K, velocidade de 70 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 84/100 e

Intelligence Index84 / 100

Input Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.60 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

45%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

QwQ Plus is 1.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
QwQ Plus has a larger context window (131K vs 128K tokens).
ERNIE 4.5 is faster at 75 tok/s vs 70 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	ERNIE 4.5	QwQ Plus
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	81	84
Provider	Baidu	Alibaba
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.60 / 1M	$0.40 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$2.40 / 1M	$1.60 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.40 / 1M	$0.27 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text	131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	8K	16K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	75 tok/s	70 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	N/A	45%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	60%	65.2%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.06 / 1M	$0.04 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

QwQ Plus

1.5x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

ERNIE 4.5

+7% faster generation

Context

QwQ Plus

131.1K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

ERNIE 4.5QwQ Plus

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs45%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

60%vs65.2%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

78.5%vs82%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1325ptsvs1335pts

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs62%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs80%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

75 tok/s vs70 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

ERNIE 4.50.51s

QwQ Plus0.85s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

ERNIE 4.57.18s

QwQ Plus7.99s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

ERNIE 4.5 Monthly API Bill

$3.15 / month

$0.6/1M in · $2.4/1M out

QwQ Plus Monthly API Bill

$2.10 / month

$0.4/1M in · $1.6/1M out

QwQ Plus saves approximately $1.05 / month (33%) under this workload.1.5x Savings

ERNIE 4.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (GPQA Diamond 60% · MMLU-Pro 78.5%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 75 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 510 ms
Economia de API competitiva ($0.6/$2.4 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas

Considerations & Trade-offs

Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

QwQ Plus · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 131K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 45% · GPQA Diamond 65.2%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 70 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 850 ms
Economia de API competitiva ($0.4/$1.6 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas

Considerations & Trade-offs

Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	ERNIE 4.5	QwQ Plus
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.16	$0.12
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	18K	24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	4K	14K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	ERNIE 4.5	QwQ Plus
Official API Model ID (SDK)	ernie-4-5	qwq-plus-instruct
API Protocol	Baidu REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)	Alibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date	2025-03	2025-03
Knowledge Cutoff	December 2024	January 2025
Architecture	Multimodal Foundation Knowledge Transformer	Deep Reasoning Chain-of-Thought Transformer
Parameters	Confidential	32B (Distilled Reasoning Engine)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM	5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.6/1M in) across full 128K window	Flat rate ($0.4/1M in) across full 131K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Cached input at $0.06/1M tokens	Cached input at $0.04/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation	API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Baidu Production Safety & Alignment Verified	Alibaba Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision, audio	text
Output Modalities	text	text

ERNIE 4.5 vs QwQ Plus: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, ERNIE 4.5 or QwQ Plus?

QwQ Plus is more intelligent. It scores 84 compared with 81 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

ERNIE 4.5 is faster, generating 75 tokens per second compared with 70 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

QwQ Plus is cheaper at $0.27 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.40 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

ERNIE 4.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.51s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

QwQ Plus has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto ERNIE 4.5 (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto QwQ Plus (Indicado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: QwQ Plus lidera em inteligência geral e programação, ERNIE 4.5 oferece geração mais rápida e QwQ Plus apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, ERNIE 4.5 ou QwQ Plus?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, QwQ Plus leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, ERNIE 4.5 ou QwQ Plus?+

O ERNIE 4.5 custa $0.60 / $2.40 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o QwQ Plus custa $0.40 / $1.60. No custo combinado, QwQ Plus é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O ERNIE 4.5 suporta 128K tokens de contexto contra 131.1K tokens do QwQ Plus, enquanto ERNIE 4.5 entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

ERNIE 4.5 vs QwQ Plus

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

ERNIE 4.5

QwQ Plus

Quem vence em cada categoria?

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

ERNIE 4.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

QwQ Plus · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Especificações Técnicas

ERNIE 4.5 vs QwQ Plus: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Veredito

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Related reading