GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Claude Opus 4.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs 연구팀 검토 완료최종 검토일: October 2026편집 정책
공유
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Claude Opus 4.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Moonshot AI의 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo와 Anthropic의 Claude Opus 4.5는 현재 가장 주목받는 AI 모델입니다. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo는 262.1K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 100만 토큰당 $0.60/$2.40(입력/출력)의 요금을 제공하며, Claude Opus 4.5는 200K 토큰 컨텍스트와 $5.00/$25.00의 요금을 제공합니다. 아래에서 벤치마크, 지연 시간 및 비용을 상세히 비교해 보세요.

1:1 모델 맞대결 비교 (VS)

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Moonshot AI

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

심층 추론 및 논리 엔진

Moonshot AI의 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo 모델은 심층 논리 추론, 고급 수학 문제 해결 및 다단계 과학적 분석에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 262K 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 90 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 84/100점(1M 토큰당 입력 $0.6 / 출력 $2.4)을 제공합니다.

Intelligence Index84 / 100
Input Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.40 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

플래그십 프론티어 모델

Anthropic의 Claude Opus 4.5 모델은 최첨단 엔터프라이즈 추론, 소프트웨어 개발 및 핵심 프로덕션 워크로드에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 200K 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 62 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 63/100점(1M 토큰당 입력 $5 / 출력 $25)을 제공합니다.

Intelligence Index63 / 100
Input Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$25.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

77.2%

한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점

  • Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is 9.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has a larger context window (262K vs 200K tokens).
  • Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is faster at 90 tok/s vs 62 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureKimi K2 Thinking TurboClaude Opus 4.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8463
Provider
Moonshot AIAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.60 / 1M$5.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$2.40 / 1M$25.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.40 / 1M$3.85 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K64K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
90 tok/s62 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/A77.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
68.5%74.8%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.06 / 1M$0.50 / 1M

부문별 우위 모델

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
9.8x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
+45% faster generation
Context
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
262.1K tokens window

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Kimi K2 Thinking TurboClaude Opus 4.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs77.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

68.5%vs74.8%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

81.5%vs87.3%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1365ptsvs1376pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs13.7%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs49.2%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs45.6%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs74.1%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

81%vs88.5%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs79.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

90 tok/s vs62 tok/s

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo0.52s
Claude Opus 4.52.10s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo6.08s
Claude Opus 4.510.16s

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo Monthly API Bill
$3.15 / month
$0.6/1M in · $2.4/1M out
Claude Opus 4.5 Monthly API Bill
$30.75 / month
$5/1M in · $25/1M out
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo saves approximately $27.60 / month (90%) under this workload.9.8x Savings

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 262K 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 16K 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (GPQA Diamond 68.5% · MMLU-Pro 81.5%)
  • 초당 90 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 520ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
  • 합리적인 API 요금 체계(1M 토큰당 입력 $0.6 / 출력 $2.4)와 프롬프트 캐싱, 함수 호출 및 정형화된 JSON 출력 완벽 지원
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 독점 클라우드 전용 모델로 로컬 오프라인 서버에 가중치를 다운로드하여 실행할 수 없습니다
  • 초고난도 학술 연구 및 수학 증명 과제에서는 상위 대형 추론 특화 모델이 더 깊은 분석을 제공할 수 있습니다

Claude Opus 4.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 200K 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 64K 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (SWE-bench Verified 77.2% · GPQA Diamond 74.8%)
  • 초당 62 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 2100ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
  • 합리적인 API 요금 체계(1M 토큰당 입력 $5 / 출력 $25)와 프롬프트 캐싱, 함수 호출 및 정형화된 JSON 출력 완벽 지원
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 독점 클라우드 전용 모델로 로컬 오프라인 서버에 가중치를 다운로드하여 실행할 수 없습니다
  • 대규모 프로덕션 호출 환경에서는 비용 절감을 위해 프롬프트 캐싱과 배치 API(Batch API) 활용이 권장됩니다

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricKimi K2 Thinking TurboClaude Opus 4.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.18$5.86
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
22K73K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
10K43K

기술 사양 (Specifications)

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureKimi K2 Thinking TurboClaude Opus 4.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)kimi-k2-thinking-turboclaude-opus-4-5-20251101
API ProtocolMoonshot AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2025-112025-11
Knowledge CutoffSeptember 2025March 2025
ArchitectureHosted Accelerated Reasoning EngineHybrid Reasoning
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.6/1M in) across full 262K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.06/1M tokens$0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationMoonshot AI Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Claude Opus 4.5: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Claude Opus 4.5?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is more intelligent. It scores 84 compared with 63 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is faster, generating 90 tokens per second compared with 62 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is cheaper at $0.40 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.52s compared with 2.10s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 200K tokens.

종합 평가

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo(심층 논리 추론, 고급 수학 문제 해결 및 다단계 과학적 분석, 엔터프라이즈 RAG 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 API 연동에 최적.)와 Claude Opus 4.5(최첨단 엔터프라이즈 추론, 소프트웨어 개발 및 핵심 프로덕션 워크로드, 엔터프라이즈 RAG 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 API 연동에 최적.) 모두 뛰어난 성능을 자랑합니다. 고난도 추론과 코딩 벤치마크에서는 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo가 앞서며, 토큰 생성 속도에서는 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo가 빠르고, 대규모 API 운영 비용 면에서는 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo가 더 경제적입니다.

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

코딩과 복잡한 추론에는 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo와 Claude Opus 4.5 중 어느 모델이 더 나은가요?+

종합 지능 지수 및 코딩 벤치마크에서는 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo가 우위를 보입니다. 상단의 SWE-bench 및 GPQA 점수를 함께 확인해 보세요.

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo와 Claude Opus 4.5의 API 요금 차이는 얼마인가요?+

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo는 100만 토큰당 입력 $0.60 / 출력 $2.40이며, Claude Opus 4.5는 입력 $5.00 / 출력 $25.00입니다. 혼합 비용 기준으로는 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo가 더 저렴합니다.

어느 모델이 더 큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 빠른 속도를 제공하나요?+

컨텍스트 길이는 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo가 262.1K 토큰, Claude Opus 4.5가 200K 토큰를 지원하며, 출력 속도 면에서는 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo가 더 빠릅니다.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

공식 출처: Moonshot AI 및 Anthropic 공식 API 문서, 시스템 카드 및 독립 벤치마크 평가 (2026).