Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-OSS 20B vs Llama 3.1 8B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs 연구팀 검토 완료최종 검토일: October 2026편집 정책

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

GPT-OSS 20BProfile

Llama 3.1 8BProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

OpenAI

GPT-OSS 20B

오픈 웨이트 추론 모델

OpenAI의 GPT-OSS 20B 모델은 강화학습 기반의 고효율 오픈 웨이트 사고 사슬(Chain-of-Thought) 추론에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 131K 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 160 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 46/100점(1M 토큰당 입력 $0.1 / 출력 $0.5)을 제공합니다.

Intelligence Index46 / 100

Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

32.5%

Llama 3.1 8B

오픈 웨이트 파운데이션 모델

Meta의 Llama 3.1 8B 모델은 프라이빗 클라우드 자체 호스팅, 파인튜닝 및 완벽한 데이터 주권 확보에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 128K 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 160 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 60/100점(무료 오픈 웨이트 제공)을 제공합니다.

Intelligence Index60 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

22%

한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점

Llama 3.1 8B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
GPT-OSS 20B has a larger context window (131K vs 128K tokens).
Llama 3.1 8B is faster at 160 tok/s vs 160 tok/s.
GPT-OSS 20B leads on SWE-bench coding (32.5% vs 22.0%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	GPT-OSS 20B	Llama 3.1 8B
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	46	60
Provider	OpenAI	Meta
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.10 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.50 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.08 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text	128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	33K	8K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	160 tok/s	160 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	32.5%	22%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	55%	38%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.01 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M

부문별 우위 모델

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

GPT-OSS 20B

+10.5% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Llama 3.1 8B

1.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Llama 3.1 8B

+0% faster generation

Context

GPT-OSS 20B

131.1K tokens window

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-OSS 20BLlama 3.1 8B

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

32.5%vs22%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

55%vs38%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

72.5%vs65%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1288ptsvs1245pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

7.2%vsN/A

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

22%vsN/A

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

24.5%vsN/A

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

46%vsN/A

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

72%vsN/A

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

63%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

160 tok/s vs160 tok/s

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

GPT-OSS 20B0.26s

Llama 3.1 8B0.22s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

GPT-OSS 20B3.38s

Llama 3.1 8B3.35s

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

GPT-OSS 20B Monthly API Bill

$0.61 / month

$0.1/1M in · $0.5/1M out

Llama 3.1 8B Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Llama 3.1 8B saves approximately $0.61 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GPT-OSS 20B · Strengths & Key Advantages

131K 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 33K 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (SWE-bench Verified 32.5% · GPQA Diamond 55%)
초당 160 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 260ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
오픈 웨이트 아키텍처 (21B (3.6B MoE))를 통해 vLLM, SGLang, Ollama 기반 자체 GPU 서버 구축 및 파인튜닝 가능

Considerations & Trade-offs

비양자화 전체 정밀도로 로컬 서버에서 구동하려면 충분한 GPU VRAM 용량이 필요합니다
초고난도 학술 연구 및 수학 증명 과제에서는 상위 대형 추론 특화 모델이 더 깊은 분석을 제공할 수 있습니다

Llama 3.1 8B · Strengths & Key Advantages

128K 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 8K 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (SWE-bench Verified 22% · GPQA Diamond 38%)
초당 160 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 220ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
오픈 웨이트 아키텍처 (8B)를 통해 vLLM, SGLang, Ollama 기반 자체 GPU 서버 구축 및 파인튜닝 가능

Considerations & Trade-offs

비양자화 전체 정밀도로 로컬 서버에서 구동하려면 충분한 GPU VRAM 용량이 필요합니다
초고난도 학술 연구 및 수학 증명 과제에서는 상위 대형 추론 특화 모델이 더 깊은 분석을 제공할 수 있습니다

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	GPT-OSS 20B	Llama 3.1 8B
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.09	$0.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	40K	4K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	18K	0K

기술 사양 (Specifications)

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	GPT-OSS 20B	Llama 3.1 8B
Official API Model ID (SDK)	gpt-oss-20b	meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B
API Protocol	OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2025-08	2024-07
Knowledge Cutoff	June 2024	December 2023
Architecture	Sparse MoE transformer with reasoning	Dense auto-regressive multilingual transformer
Parameters	21B (3.6B active MoE)	8B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 131K window	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix caching at $0.01/1M (no extra cache-write fee)	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 13 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 45 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text
Output Modalities	text	text

GPT-OSS 20B vs Llama 3.1 8B: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-OSS 20B or Llama 3.1 8B?

Llama 3.1 8B is more intelligent. It scores 60 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 3.1 8B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.22s compared with 0.26s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-OSS 20B has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

종합 평가

GPT-OSS 20B(강화학습 기반의 고효율 오픈 웨이트 사고 사슬(Chain-of-Thought) 추론, 엔터프라이즈 RAG 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 API 연동에 최적.)와 Llama 3.1 8B(프라이빗 클라우드 자체 호스팅, 파인튜닝 및 완벽한 데이터 주권 확보, 엔터프라이즈 RAG 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 API 연동에 최적.) 모두 뛰어난 성능을 자랑합니다. 고난도 추론과 코딩 벤치마크에서는 Llama 3.1 8B가 앞서며, 토큰 생성 속도에서는 GPT-OSS 20B가 빠르고, 대규모 API 운영 비용 면에서는 Llama 3.1 8B가 더 경제적입니다.

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

코딩과 복잡한 추론에는 GPT-OSS 20B와 Llama 3.1 8B 중 어느 모델이 더 나은가요?+

종합 지능 지수 및 코딩 벤치마크에서는 Llama 3.1 8B가 우위를 보입니다. 상단의 SWE-bench 및 GPQA 점수를 함께 확인해 보세요.

GPT-OSS 20B와 Llama 3.1 8B의 API 요금 차이는 얼마인가요?+

GPT-OSS 20B는 100만 토큰당 입력 $0.10 / 출력 $0.50이며, Llama 3.1 8B는 입력 $0.00 / 출력 $0.00입니다. 혼합 비용 기준으로는 Llama 3.1 8B가 더 저렴합니다.

어느 모델이 더 큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 빠른 속도를 제공하나요?+

컨텍스트 길이는 GPT-OSS 20B가 131.1K 토큰, Llama 3.1 8B가 128K 토큰를 지원하며, 출력 속도 면에서는 GPT-OSS 20B가 더 빠릅니다.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

GPT-OSS 20B vs Llama 3.1 8B

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

GPT-OSS 20B

Llama 3.1 8B

부문별 우위 모델

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

GPT-OSS 20B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Llama 3.1 8B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

기술 사양 (Specifications)

GPT-OSS 20B vs Llama 3.1 8B: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

종합 평가

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

Related reading