GPT-OSS 20B vs Llama 3.1 8B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
GPT-OSS 20B by OpenAI and Llama 3.1 8B by Meta represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Llama 3.1 8B holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Llama 3.1 8B is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, GPT-OSS 20B provides an expanded memory horizon with 131K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, both models deliver balanced throughput and low time-to-first-token latency for interactive conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
GPT-OSS 20B
오픈 웨이트 모델OpenAI의 GPT-OSS 20B 모델은 131K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $0.1/1M 토큰, 출력 $0.5/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.
$0.10 / 1M
$0.50 / 1M
131.1K tokens
32.5%
Llama 3.1 8B
오픈 웨이트 모델Meta의 Llama 3.1 8B 모델은 128K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $0/1M 토큰, 출력 $0/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
128K tokens
22%
한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점
- Llama 3.1 8B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-OSS 20B has a larger context window (131K vs 128K tokens).
- Llama 3.1 8B is faster at 160 tok/s vs 160 tok/s.
- GPT-OSS 20B leads on SWE-bench coding (32.5% vs 22.0%).
| Feature | GPT-OSS 20B | Llama 3.1 8B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 46 | 60 |
Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.10 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.50 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.08 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 33K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 160 tok/s | 160 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 32.5% | 22% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 55% | 38% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.01 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
부문별 우위 모델
At-a-glance decision framework검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GPT-OSS 20B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- OpenAI의 첨단 Sparse MoE transformer with reasoning 아키텍처와 최대 131K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
- 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $0.1/1M, 출력 $0.5/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
- 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
- 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨
Llama 3.1 8B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Meta의 첨단 Dense auto-regressive multilingual transformer 아키텍처와 최대 128K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
- 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $0/1M, 출력 $0/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
- 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
- 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GPT-OSS 20B | Llama 3.1 8B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.09 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 40K | 4K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 18K | 0K |
기술 사양 (Specifications)
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | GPT-OSS 20B | Llama 3.1 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | gpt-oss-20b | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-08 | 2024-07 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | June 2024 | December 2023 |
| Architecture | Sparse MoE transformer with reasoning | Dense auto-regressive multilingual transformer |
| Parameters | 21B (3.6B active MoE) | 8B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 131K window | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.01/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 13 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 45 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
GPT-OSS 20B vs Llama 3.1 8B: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, GPT-OSS 20B or Llama 3.1 8B?
Llama 3.1 8B is more intelligent. It scores 60 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Llama 3.1 8B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.22s compared with 0.26s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-OSS 20B has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
종합 평가
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose GPT-OSS 20B if your priority is Self-hosted agents, on-premise deployments and privacy-sensitive work. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Llama 3.1 8B if your workflow prioritizes Local offline development, edge device inference, and cost-free SaaS backends. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)
How does GPT-OSS 20B compare to Llama 3.1 8B in API token pricing and cost per token?+
GPT-OSS 20B costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens, whereas Llama 3.1 8B costs $0.00 input and $0.00 output. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: GPT-OSS 20B or Llama 3.1 8B?+
GPT-OSS 20B supports a context window of 131K tokens (~98k words), while Llama 3.1 8B supports 128K tokens (~96k words). Therefore, GPT-OSS 20B can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: GPT-OSS 20B or Llama 3.1 8B?+
GPT-OSS 20B scores 32.5% on SWE-bench Verified while Llama 3.1 8B scores 22%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, GPT-OSS 20B holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between GPT-OSS 20B and Llama 3.1 8B?+
GPT-OSS 20B features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Llama 3.1 8B focuses on standard fast inference.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between GPT-OSS 20B and Llama 3.1 8B?+
Both GPT-OSS 20B and Llama 3.1 8B deliver matching throughput at approximately 160 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, streaming response velocity is comparable, with real-world time-to-first-token (TTFT) determined primarily by provider routing and concurrency load.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining GPT-OSS 20B and Llama 3.1 8B to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Llama 3.1 8B to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to GPT-OSS 20B. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Llama 3.1 8B vs Llama 3.1 70B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs Llama 3.1 8B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL vs GPT-OSS 20B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs GPT-OSS 20B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
공식 출처: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs