Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Llama 4 Behemoth vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Llama 4 BehemothProfile

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Llama 4 Behemoth

Modello Base a Pesi Aperti

Llama 4 Behemoth di Meta è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 10M, velocità di 45 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 93/100 e

Intelligence Index93 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

10M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

75%

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Modello Base a Pesi Aperti

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B di NVIDIA è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 65 token/s, indice di intelligenza d

Intelligence Index60 / 100

Input Token:

$1.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

64.5%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

Llama 4 Behemoth is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Llama 4 Behemoth has a larger context window (10M vs 1M tokens).
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is faster at 65 tok/s vs 45 tok/s.
Llama 4 Behemoth leads on SWE-bench coding (75.0% vs 64.5%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Llama 4 Behemoth	Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	93	60
Provider	Meta	NVIDIA
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$1.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$3.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$0.68 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	10M tokens~15,000 A4 pages of text	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	64K	66K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	45 tok/s	65 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	75%	64.5%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	82%	76%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.25 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Llama 4 Behemoth

+10.5% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Llama 4 Behemoth

1.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

+44% faster generation

Context

Llama 4 Behemoth

10M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Llama 4 BehemothNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

75%vs64.5%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

82%vs76%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.5%vs87.5%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1490ptsvs1425pts

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs53%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs86%

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

95%vs89%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

45 tok/s vs65 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Llama 4 Behemoth1.20s

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B0.62s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Llama 4 Behemoth12.31s

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B8.31s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Llama 4 Behemoth Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B Monthly API Bill

$4.58 / month

$1/1M in · $3/1M out

Llama 4 Behemoth saves approximately $4.58 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Llama 4 Behemoth · Strengths & Key Advantages

Finestra di contesto da 10M con capacità massima di output fino a 64K token (SWE-bench Verified 75% · GPQA Diamond 82%)
Throughput elevato di 45 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 1200 ms
Pesi aperti (2T total / 288B (16-of-2 MoE)) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 64.5% · GPQA Diamond 76%)
Throughput elevato di 65 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 620 ms
Pesi aperti (550B (55B MoE)) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Llama 4 Behemoth	Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$0.85
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	35K	48K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	15K	24K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Llama 4 Behemoth	Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
Official API Model ID (SDK)	meta-llama/Llama-4-Behemoth	nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2026-05	2026-06
Knowledge Cutoff	February 2026	February 2026
Architecture	Colossal sparse MoE architecture (288B active / 2T total, 16-of-2 MoE)	Colossal Sparse MoE (550B Total / 55B Active)
Parameters	2T total / 288B active (16-of-2 MoE)	550B (55B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Flat rate ($1/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Cached input at $0.25/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1240 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4300 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 341 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1183 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text, vision	text
Output Modalities	text	text

Llama 4 Behemoth vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Llama 4 Behemoth or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?

Llama 4 Behemoth is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 60 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 45 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 4 Behemoth is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.68 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.62s compared with 1.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama 4 Behemoth has a larger context window, supporting 10M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Llama 4 Behemoth (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Llama 4 Behemoth guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B garantisce una generazione più rapida e Llama 4 Behemoth offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Llama 4 Behemoth o Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Llama 4 Behemoth. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Llama 4 Behemoth e Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?+

Llama 4 Behemoth costa $0.00 / $0.00 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costa $1.00 / $3.00. Nel costo combinato, Llama 4 Behemoth risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Llama 4 Behemoth supporta 10M token di contesto contro 1M token di Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B, mentre Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Llama 4 Behemoth vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Llama 4 Behemoth

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Llama 4 Behemoth · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Specifiche Tecniche

Llama 4 Behemoth vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Verdetto

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Related reading