Mixtral 8x7B vs Llama 3 (8B)
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Mixtral 8x7B dari Mistral AI dan Llama 3 (8B) dari Meta adalah dua model AI unggulan. Mixtral 8x7B menawarkan jendela konteks 32.8K token dengan harga $0.20/$0.20 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Llama 3 (8B) menyediakan konteks 8.2K token seharga $0.05/$0.10 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Mixtral 8x7B
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaMixtral 8x7B dari Mistral AI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 33K, kecepatan 130 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 37/100, serta tarif $0.
$0.20 / 1M
$0.20 / 1M
32.8K tokens
N/A
Llama 3 (8B)
Inferensi Super CepatLlama 3 (8B) dari Meta adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk interaksi real-time dengan latensi sangat rendah dan routing bervolume tinggi, menghadirkan jendela konteks 8K, kecepatan 210 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 34/100, serta tarif $0.
$0.05 / 1M
$0.10 / 1M
8.2K tokens
12%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Llama 3 (8B) is 3.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Mixtral 8x7B has a larger context window (33K vs 8K tokens).
- Llama 3 (8B) is faster at 210 tok/s vs 130 tok/s.
| Feature | Mixtral 8x7B | Llama 3 (8B) |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 37 | 34 |
Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.20 / 1M | $0.05 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.20 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.10 / 1M | $0.03 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text | 8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 4K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 130 tok/s | 210 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 12% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 38% | 34.2% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.05 / 1M | $0.01 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Mixtral 8x7B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 33K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (GPQA Diamond 38% · MMLU-Pro 66.5%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 130 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 380 ms
- Bobot terbuka (46.7B (12.9B )) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Llama 3 (8B) · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 8K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (SWE-bench Verified 12% · GPQA Diamond 34.2%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 210 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 220 ms
- Bobot terbuka (8B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Mixtral 8x7B | Llama 3 (8B) |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.20 | $0.20 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 24K | 24K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Mixtral 8x7B | Llama 3 (8B) |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | mixtral-8x7b-latest | meta-llama/Llama-3-(8B) |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2023-12 | 2024-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | Late 2023 | March 2024 |
| Architecture | Sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE, 2 active of 8) | Dense GQA Transformer with 128K Tokenizer |
| Parameters | 46.7B (12.9B active) | 8B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 33K window | Flat rate ($0.05/1M in) across full 8K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.05/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.0125/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 29 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 100 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Mixtral 8x7B vs Llama 3 (8B): Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Mixtral 8x7B or Llama 3 (8B)?
Mixtral 8x7B is more intelligent. It scores 37 compared with 34 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Llama 3 (8B) is faster, generating 210 tokens per second compared with 130 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Llama 3 (8B) is cheaper at $0.03 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.10 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Llama 3 (8B) has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.22s compared with 0.38s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Mixtral 8x7B has a larger context window, supporting 32.8K tokens compared with 8.2K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik Mixtral 8x7B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Llama 3 (8B) (Sangat cocok untuk interaksi real-time dengan latensi sangat rendah dan routing bervolume tinggi, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Mixtral 8x7B unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Llama 3 (8B) memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Llama 3 (8B) lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Mixtral 8x7B atau Llama 3 (8B)?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Mixtral 8x7B memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Mixtral 8x7B vs Llama 3 (8B)?+
Mixtral 8x7B mengenakan biaya $0.20 / $0.20 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Llama 3 (8B) sebesar $0.05 / $0.10. Secara keseluruhan, Llama 3 (8B) lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Mixtral 8x7B mendukung konteks 32.8K token dibandingkan 8.2K token pada Llama 3 (8B), sementara Llama 3 (8B) unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Llama 3 (8B) vs Llama 3 (70B): Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Mixtral 8x22B vs Mixtral 8x7B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Mixtral 8x7B vs Mistral 7B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Mistral AI & Meta serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).