Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Mixtral 8x22B vs Mixtral 8x7B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Mixtral 8x22B vs Mixtral 8x7B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Mixtral 8x22B dari Mistral AI dan Mixtral 8x7B dari Mistral AI adalah dua model AI unggulan. Mixtral 8x22B menawarkan jendela konteks 65.5K token dengan harga $1.20/$1.20 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Mixtral 8x7B menyediakan konteks 32.8K token seharga $0.20/$0.20 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Mixtral 8x22B

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Mixtral 8x22B dari Mistral AI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 66K, kecepatan 55 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 44/100, serta tarif $1.

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

65.5K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

36%

Mistral AI

Mixtral 8x7B

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Mixtral 8x7B dari Mistral AI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 33K, kecepatan 130 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 37/100, serta tarif $0.

Intelligence Index37 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Context Window:

32.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Mixtral 8x7B is 6.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Mixtral 8x22B has a larger context window (66K vs 33K tokens).
  • Mixtral 8x7B is faster at 130 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureMixtral 8x22BMixtral 8x7B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4437
Provider
Mistral AIMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.20 / 1M$0.20 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$1.20 / 1M$0.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.78 / 1M$0.10 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
65.5K tokens~98 A4 pages of text32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
55 tok/s130 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
36%N/A
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
51.2%38%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.60 / 1M$0.05 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Mixtral 8x7B
6.8x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Mixtral 8x7B
+136% faster generation
Context
Mixtral 8x22B
65.5K tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Mixtral 8x22BMixtral 8x7B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

36%vsN/A
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

51.2%vs38%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74%vs66.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1260ptsvs1195pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

31%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

62%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

68%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

55 tok/s vs130 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Mixtral 8x22B0.70s
Mixtral 8x7B0.38s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Mixtral 8x22B9.79s
Mixtral 8x7B4.23s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Mixtral 8x22B Monthly API Bill
$3.78 / month
$1.2/1M in · $1.2/1M out
Mixtral 8x7B Monthly API Bill
$0.56 / month
$0.2/1M in · $0.2/1M out
Mixtral 8x7B saves approximately $3.22 / month (85%) under this workload.6.8x Savings

Mixtral 8x22B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 66K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 36% · GPQA Diamond 51.2%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 55 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 700 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (141B total (39B MoE)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Mixtral 8x7B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 33K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (GPQA Diamond 38% · MMLU-Pro 66.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 130 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 380 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (46.7B (12.9B )) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMixtral 8x22BMixtral 8x7B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.45$0.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
35K24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureMixtral 8x22BMixtral 8x7B
Official API Model ID (SDK)mixtral-8x22b-latestmixtral-8x7b-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2024-042023-12
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2024Late 2023
ArchitectureSparse Mixture-of-Experts (8x22B)Sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE, 2 active of 8)
Parameters141B total (39B active MoE)46.7B (12.9B active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.2/1M in) across full 66K windowFlat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 33K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.6/1M tokensCached input at $0.05/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 87 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 303 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 29 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 100 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Mixtral 8x22B vs Mixtral 8x7B: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Mixtral 8x22B or Mixtral 8x7B?

Mixtral 8x22B is more intelligent. It scores 44 compared with 37 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Mixtral 8x7B is faster, generating 130 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.10 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.78 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Mixtral 8x7B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 0.70s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Mixtral 8x22B has a larger context window, supporting 65.5K tokens compared with 32.8K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Mixtral 8x22B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Mixtral 8x7B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Mixtral 8x22B unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Mixtral 8x7B memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Mixtral 8x7B lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Mixtral 8x22B atau Mixtral 8x7B?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Mixtral 8x22B memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Mixtral 8x22B vs Mixtral 8x7B?+

Mixtral 8x22B mengenakan biaya $1.20 / $1.20 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Mixtral 8x7B sebesar $0.20 / $0.20. Secara keseluruhan, Mixtral 8x7B lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Mixtral 8x22B mendukung konteks 65.5K token dibandingkan 32.8K token pada Mixtral 8x7B, sementara Mixtral 8x7B unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Mistral AI & Mistral AI serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).