Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Grok 4.7 dari xAI dan DeepSeek V4.1-Flash dari DeepSeek adalah dua model AI unggulan. Grok 4.7 menawarkan jendela konteks 500K token dengan harga $2.00/$6.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan DeepSeek V4.1-Flash menyediakan konteks 1M token seharga $0.30/$1.20 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
xAI

Grok 4.7

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

Grok 4.7 dari xAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 500K, kecepatan 110 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 46/100, serta tarif $2/$6

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

500K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

77.2%

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash dari DeepSeek adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 110 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 58/100, serta tarif

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.2%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is 5.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 500K tokens).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is faster at 110 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • Grok 4.7 leads on SWE-bench coding (77.2% vs 74.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGrok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4658
Provider
xAIDeepSeek
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$6.00 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.35 / 1M$0.18 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
500K tokens~750 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K384K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
110 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
77.2%74.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
78.5%90.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.50 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Grok 4.7
+3.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
5.9x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
+0% faster generation
Context
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
1M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Grok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

77.2%vs74.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

78.5%vs90.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.6%vs89.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1465ptsvs1455pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

15.2%vs16.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

38%vs31.2%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

52.4%vs48%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

76.5%vs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

91.2%vs92.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

89.5%vs93%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

110 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Grok 4.70.62s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash0.46s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Grok 4.75.17s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash5.01s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Grok 4.7 Monthly API Bill
$9.15 / month
$2/1M in · $6/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash Monthly API Bill
$1.54 / month
$0.3/1M in · $1.2/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash saves approximately $7.61 / month (83%) under this workload.5.9x Savings

Grok 4.7 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 500K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 77.2% · GPQA Diamond 78.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 110 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 620 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $2/$6 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 384K token (SWE-bench Verified 74.2% · GPQA Diamond 90.9%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 110 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 460 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode )) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGrok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.68$0.27
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
46K58K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
23K28K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGrok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Official API Model ID (SDK)grok-4-7-latestdeepseek-reasoner
API ProtocolxAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026June 2026
Architecture2.1T Multimodal Sparse MoECausal Encoder-Decoder (20 enc + 20 dec layers)
Parameters2.1T (MoE)763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 500K windowFlat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.5/1M tokensAutomatic prefix caching at $0.006/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxReal-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code ExecutionSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 473 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1640 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationxAI Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Grok 4.7 or DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is more intelligent. It scores 58 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is cheaper to run?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is cheaper at $0.18 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.35 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.46s compared with 0.62s.

Which model has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 500K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Grok 4.7 (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun DeepSeek V4.1-Flash (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: DeepSeek V4.1-Flash unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Grok 4.7 memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan DeepSeek V4.1-Flash lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Grok 4.7 atau DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

Grok 4.7 mengenakan biaya $2.00 / $6.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan DeepSeek V4.1-Flash sebesar $0.30 / $1.20. Secara keseluruhan, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Grok 4.7 mendukung konteks 500K token dibandingkan 1M token pada DeepSeek V4.1-Flash, sementara Grok 4.7 unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi xAI & DeepSeek serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).