Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-6 Luna dari OpenAI dan DeepSeek V4.1-Flash dari DeepSeek adalah dua model AI unggulan. GPT-6 Luna menawarkan jendela konteks 272K token dengan harga $0.10/$0.50 per 1 juta token, sedangkan DeepSeek V4.1-Flash menyediakan konteks 1M token seharga $0.30/$1.20 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-6 Luna

Model Ringan & Hemat Biaya

GPT-6 Luna dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk efisiensi biaya API maksimal per token dan throughput produksi yang ringan, menghadirkan jendela konteks 272K, kecepatan 245 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 67/100, serta tarif $0.1

Intelligence Index67 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Context Window:

272K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

70.5%

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash dari DeepSeek adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 110 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 58/100, serta tarif

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.2%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • GPT-6 Luna is 2.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 272K tokens).
  • GPT-6 Luna is faster at 245 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash leads on SWE-bench coding (74.2% vs 70.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6758
Provider
OpenAIDeepSeek
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.50 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.08 / 1M$0.18 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K384K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
245 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
70.5%74.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
73.5%90.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
+3.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-6 Luna
2.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-6 Luna
+123% faster generation
Context
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
1M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

70.5%vs74.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

73.5%vs90.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86%vs89.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1405ptsvs1455pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

13%vs16.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

44%vs31.2%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

41%vs48%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

68%vs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

90.2%vs92.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80%vs93%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

245 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-6 Luna0.38s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash0.46s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-6 Luna2.42s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash5.01s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-6 Luna Monthly API Bill
$0.61 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.5/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash Monthly API Bill
$1.54 / month
$0.3/1M in · $1.2/1M out
GPT-6 Luna saves approximately $0.92 / month (60%) under this workload.2.5x Savings

GPT-6 Luna · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 272K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 70.5% · GPQA Diamond 73.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 245 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 380 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $0.1/$0.5 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 384K token (SWE-bench Verified 74.2% · GPQA Diamond 90.9%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 110 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 460 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode )) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.13$0.27
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
46K58K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
21K28K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-6-lunadeepseek-reasoner
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026June 2026
ArchitectureUltra-budget compact reasoning modelCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 enc + 20 dec layers)
ParametersConfidential763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 272K windowFlat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.01/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $0.006/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 473 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1640 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-6 Luna or DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?

GPT-6 Luna is more intelligent. It scores 67 compared with 58 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6 Luna is faster, generating 245 tokens per second compared with 110 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.08 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.18 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-6 Luna has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 0.46s.

Which model has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 272K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik GPT-6 Luna (Sangat cocok untuk efisiensi biaya API maksimal per token dan throughput produksi yang ringan, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun DeepSeek V4.1-Flash (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: GPT-6 Luna unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, GPT-6 Luna memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan GPT-6 Luna lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, GPT-6 Luna atau DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, GPT-6 Luna memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

GPT-6 Luna mengenakan biaya $0.10 / $0.50 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan DeepSeek V4.1-Flash sebesar $0.30 / $1.20. Secara keseluruhan, GPT-6 Luna lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

GPT-6 Luna mendukung konteks 272K token dibandingkan 1M token pada DeepSeek V4.1-Flash, sementara GPT-6 Luna unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi OpenAI & DeepSeek serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).