GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Grok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Grok 4.7 dari xAI dan Claude Opus 5.5 dari Anthropic adalah dua model AI unggulan. Grok 4.7 menawarkan jendela konteks 500K token dengan harga $2.00/$6.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Claude Opus 5.5 menyediakan konteks 1M token seharga $4.00/$20.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
xAI

Grok 4.7

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

Grok 4.7 dari xAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 500K, kecepatan 110 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 46/100, serta tarif $2/$6

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

500K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

77.2%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

Claude Opus 5.5 dari Anthropic adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 78 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 94/100, serta ta

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

84.6%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Grok 4.7 is 2.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window (1M vs 500K tokens).
  • Grok 4.7 is faster at 110 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 77.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGrok 4.7Claude Opus 5.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4694
Provider
xAIAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$6.00 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.35 / 1M$3.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
500K tokens~750 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
110 tok/s78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
77.2%84.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
78.5%82.3%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.50 / 1M$0.40 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5.5
+7.4% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Grok 4.7
2.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Grok 4.7
+41% faster generation
Context
Claude Opus 5.5
1M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Grok 4.7Claude Opus 5.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

77.2%vs84.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

78.5%vs82.3%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.6%vs91.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1465ptsvs1507pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

15.2%vs19.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

38%vs66.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

52.4%vs58.7%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

76.5%vs83.1%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

91.2%vs95.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

89.5%vs92.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

110 tok/s vs78 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Grok 4.70.62s
Claude Opus 5.51.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Grok 4.75.17s
Claude Opus 5.57.81s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Grok 4.7 Monthly API Bill
$9.15 / month
$2/1M in · $6/1M out
Claude Opus 5.5 Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
Grok 4.7 saves approximately $15.45 / month (63%) under this workload.2.7x Savings

Grok 4.7 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 500K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 77.2% · GPQA Diamond 78.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 110 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 620 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $2/$6 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 84.6% · GPQA Diamond 82.3%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 78 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1400 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $4/$20 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGrok 4.7Claude Opus 5.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.68$3.85
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
46K68K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
23K42K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGrok 4.7Claude Opus 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)grok-4-7-latestclaude-opus-5-5-20260901
API ProtocolxAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026June 2026
Architecture2.1T Multimodal Sparse MoEExtended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer
Parameters2.1T (MoE)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 500K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.5/1M tokens$0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxReal-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code ExecutionNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationxAI Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Grok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Grok 4.7 or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Grok 4.7 is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $1.35 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Grok 4.7 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.62s compared with 1.40s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 500K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Grok 4.7 (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Claude Opus 5.5 (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Claude Opus 5.5 unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Grok 4.7 memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Grok 4.7 lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Grok 4.7 atau Claude Opus 5.5?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Claude Opus 5.5 memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Grok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5?+

Grok 4.7 mengenakan biaya $2.00 / $6.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Claude Opus 5.5 sebesar $4.00 / $20.00. Secara keseluruhan, Grok 4.7 lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Grok 4.7 mendukung konteks 500K token dibandingkan 1M token pada Claude Opus 5.5, sementara Grok 4.7 unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi xAI & Anthropic serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).