GLM-5V-Turbo vs Hunyuan Large V2
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
GLM-5V-Turbo by Zhipu AI and Hunyuan Large V2 by Tencent represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Hunyuan Large V2 holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, GLM-5V-Turbo is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Hunyuan Large V2 provides an expanded memory horizon with 512K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, GLM-5V-Turbo leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
GLM-5V-Turbo
Model Penalaran MendalamGLM-5V-Turbo dari Zhipu AI adalah model AI canggih dengan jendela konteks 200K token serta harga API $0.9/1M token input dan $2.7/1M token output untuk pemrograman, penalaran, dan otomasi bisnis.
$0.90 / 1M
$2.70 / 1M
200K tokens
N/A
Hunyuan Large V2
Model Penalaran MendalamHunyuan Large V2 dari Tencent adalah model AI canggih dengan jendela konteks 512K token serta harga API $0.7/1M token input dan $2.8/1M token output untuk pemrograman, penalaran, dan otomasi bisnis.
$0.70 / 1M
$2.80 / 1M
512K tokens
N/A
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Hunyuan Large V2 is 1.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Hunyuan Large V2 has a larger context window (512K vs 200K tokens).
- GLM-5V-Turbo is faster at 85 tok/s vs 80 tok/s.
| Feature | GLM-5V-Turbo | Hunyuan Large V2 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 85 | 85 |
Provider | Zhipu AI | Tencent |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.90 / 1M | $0.70 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $2.70 / 1M | $2.80 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.51 / 1M | $0.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text | 512K tokens~768 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 80 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 64% | 66% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.09 / 1M | $0.07 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GLM-5V-Turbo · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arsitektur Frontier Commercial Vision-Language Transformer mutakhir dari Zhipu AI dengan dukungan konteks 200K token
- Efisiensi biaya API yang kompetitif ($0.9/1M input, $2.7/1M output) dan respons cepat
- Performa andal dalam pembuatan kode, analisis logika, serta pemahaman multibahasa
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Penggunaan konteks berukuran penuh memerlukan pengelolaan anggaran token yang cermat
- Membutuhkan perancangan prompt yang tepat untuk kasus penggunaan industri spesifik
Hunyuan Large V2 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arsitektur High-Scale Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformer mutakhir dari Tencent dengan dukungan konteks 512K token
- Efisiensi biaya API yang kompetitif ($0.7/1M input, $2.8/1M output) dan respons cepat
- Performa andal dalam pembuatan kode, analisis logika, serta pemahaman multibahasa
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Penggunaan konteks berukuran penuh memerlukan pengelolaan anggaran token yang cermat
- Membutuhkan perancangan prompt yang tepat untuk kasus penggunaan industri spesifik
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GLM-5V-Turbo | Hunyuan Large V2 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.22 | $0.22 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 20K | 22K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 6K | 7K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | GLM-5V-Turbo | Hunyuan Large V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | glm-5v-turbo | hunyuan-large-v2 |
| API Protocol | Zhipu AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Tencent REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-05 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Frontier Commercial Vision-Language Transformer | High-Scale Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential | 500B total (30B active MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.9/1M in) across full 200K window | Flat rate ($0.7/1M in) across full 512K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.09/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.07/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Zhipu AI Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Tencent Production Safety & Alignment Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Hunyuan Large V2: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which model is faster?
GLM-5V-Turbo is faster, generating 85 tokens per second compared with 80 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Hunyuan Large V2 is cheaper at $0.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.51 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Hunyuan Large V2 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.48s compared with 0.49s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Hunyuan Large V2 has a larger context window, supporting 512K tokens compared with 200K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose GLM-5V-Turbo if your priority is Visual RPA, mobile UI automated testing, financial document intelligence, and visual agents. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Hunyuan Large V2 if your workflow prioritizes Social chatbots, creative writing, game NPC dialogue, and extensive document summarization. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
How does GLM-5V-Turbo compare to Hunyuan Large V2 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
GLM-5V-Turbo costs $0.90 per 1M input tokens and $2.70 per 1M output tokens, whereas Hunyuan Large V2 costs $0.70 input and $2.80 output. Overall, Hunyuan Large V2 is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: GLM-5V-Turbo or Hunyuan Large V2?+
GLM-5V-Turbo supports a context window of 200K tokens (~150k words), while Hunyuan Large V2 supports 512K tokens (~384k words). Therefore, Hunyuan Large V2 can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: GLM-5V-Turbo or Hunyuan Large V2?+
GLM-5V-Turbo scores at the frontier of coding benchmarks, while Hunyuan Large V2 scores competitively for software generation. For complex autonomous debugging and agentic engineering, GLM-5V-Turbo provides robust code generation and tool calling.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between GLM-5V-Turbo and Hunyuan Large V2?+
GLM-5V-Turbo features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Hunyuan Large V2 provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between GLM-5V-Turbo and Hunyuan Large V2?+
GLM-5V-Turbo generates approximately 85 tokens per second, while Hunyuan Large V2 delivers 80 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, GLM-5V-Turbo provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining GLM-5V-Turbo and Hunyuan Large V2 to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Hunyuan Large V2 to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to GLM-5V-Turbo. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- GLM-5V-Turbo vs GLM-5-Turbo: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Hunyuan Large V2 vs Claude Opus 4.8: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs