Gemini Omni Flash vs Veo 3.1
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Gemini Omni Flash dari Google dan Veo 3.1 dari Google adalah dua model AI unggulan. Gemini Omni Flash menawarkan jendela konteks 1.05M token dengan harga $2.00/$15.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Veo 3.1 menyediakan konteks 4.1K token seharga $7.00/$450.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Gemini Omni Flash
Model Generasi Video AIGemini Omni Flash dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk pembuatan video sinematik AI dan sintesis gerakan yang mulus, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1.0M, kecepatan 75 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 86/100, serta tarif $2/$15 per 1
$2.00 / 1M
$15.00 / 1M
1.05M tokens
N/A
Veo 3.1
Model Generasi Video AIVeo 3.1 dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk pembuatan video sinematik AI dan sintesis gerakan yang mulus, menghadirkan jendela konteks 4K, kecepatan 14 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 88/100, serta tarif $7/$450 per 1M token.
$7.00 / 1M
$450.00 / 1M
4.1K tokens
N/A
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Gemini Omni Flash is 24.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini Omni Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 4K tokens).
- Gemini Omni Flash is faster at 75 tok/s vs 14 tok/s.
| Feature | Gemini Omni Flash | Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 86 | 88 |
Provider | ||
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $2.00 / 1M | $7.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $15.00 / 1M | $450.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $2.25 / 1M | $46.40 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text | 4.1K tokens~6 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 33K | 4K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 75 tok/s | 14 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.50 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemini Omni Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 1.0M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 33K token (Arena Elo 1440)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 75 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 800 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $2/$15 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya
Veo 3.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 4K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (Arena Elo 1450)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 14 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 4200 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $7/$450 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemini Omni Flash | Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.50 | $3.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 15K | 0K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 4K | 0K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemini Omni Flash | Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemini-omni-flash | models/veo-3-1 |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-06 | 2025-10 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | July 2025 |
| Architecture | Unified real-time text-to-video and conversational streaming engine | Controllable audio-video generation and in-context video editor |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Flat rate ($7/1M in) across full 4K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.5/1M with configurable TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Prompt-based JSON extraction only |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | video | video |
Gemini Omni Flash vs Veo 3.1: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemini Omni Flash or Veo 3.1?
Veo 3.1 is more intelligent. It scores 88 compared with 86 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini Omni Flash is faster, generating 75 tokens per second compared with 14 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini Omni Flash is cheaper at $2.25 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $46.40 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini Omni Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.80s compared with 4.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini Omni Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 4.1K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik Gemini Omni Flash (Sangat cocok untuk pembuatan video sinematik AI dan sintesis gerakan yang mulus, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Veo 3.1 (Sangat cocok untuk pembuatan video sinematik AI dan sintesis gerakan yang mulus, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Veo 3.1 unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Gemini Omni Flash memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Gemini Omni Flash lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Gemini Omni Flash atau Veo 3.1?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Veo 3.1 memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Gemini Omni Flash vs Veo 3.1?+
Gemini Omni Flash mengenakan biaya $2.00 / $15.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Veo 3.1 sebesar $7.00 / $450.00. Secara keseluruhan, Gemini Omni Flash lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Gemini Omni Flash mendukung konteks 1.05M token dibandingkan 4.1K token pada Veo 3.1, sementara Gemini Omni Flash unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Gemini Omni Flash vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Veo 3.1 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Google & Google serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).