Head-to-Head Model Comparison

DeepSeek V4 vs Gemma 4 E2B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

DeepSeek V4Profile

Gemma 4 E2BProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

DeepSeek V4 dari DeepSeek adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 78 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 56/100, serta tarif $0.3/$1.

Intelligence Index56 / 100

Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

62.8%

Google

Gemma 4 E2B

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Gemma 4 E2B dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 131K, kecepatan 260 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 55/100, serta akses gratis

Intelligence Index55 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

Gemma 4 E2B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
DeepSeek V4 has a larger context window (1M vs 131K tokens).
Gemma 4 E2B is faster at 260 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	DeepSeek V4	Gemma 4 E2B
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	56	55
Provider	DeepSeek	Google
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.30 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$1.20 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.20 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text	131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	66K	8K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	78 tok/s	260 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	62.8%	N/A
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	78.4%	N/A
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.03 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

Gemma 4 E2B

1.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Gemma 4 E2B

+233% faster generation

Context

DeepSeek V4

1M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

DeepSeek V4Gemma 4 E2B

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

62.8%vsN/A

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

78.4%vsN/A

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

87.5%vs67.2%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1415ptsvs1260pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

14.5%vsN/A

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

42%vsN/A

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

39.5%vsN/A

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

65%vsN/A

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

89%vsN/A

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

88%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

78 tok/s vs260 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

DeepSeek V40.60s

Gemma 4 E2B0.18s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

DeepSeek V47.01s

Gemma 4 E2B2.10s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

DeepSeek V4 Monthly API Bill

$1.57 / month

$0.3/1M in · $1.2/1M out

Gemma 4 E2B Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Gemma 4 E2B saves approximately $1.57 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

DeepSeek V4 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 62.8% · GPQA Diamond 78.4%)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 78 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 600 ms
Bobot terbuka (MoE (Colossal)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Gemma 4 E2B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 131K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (MMLU-Pro 67.2% · Arena Elo 1260)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 260 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 180 ms
Bobot terbuka (E2B (2B)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	DeepSeek V4	Gemma 4 E2B
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.38	$0.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	48K	2K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	22K	1K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	DeepSeek V4	Gemma 4 E2B
Official API Model ID (SDK)	deepseek-reasoner	models/gemma-4-e2b
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date	2026-07	2026-04
Knowledge Cutoff	April 2026	January 2026
Architecture	Next-Gen Sparse MoE with MLA	Ultra-compact edge transformer
Parameters	MoE (Colossal)	E2B (2B)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 1000K window	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix caching at $0.03/1M (no extra cache-write fee)	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

DeepSeek V4 vs Gemma 4 E2B: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, DeepSeek V4 or Gemma 4 E2B?

DeepSeek V4 is more intelligent. It scores 56 compared with 55 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemma 4 E2B is faster, generating 260 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemma 4 E2B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.20 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemma 4 E2B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.18s compared with 0.60s.

Which model has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V4 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik DeepSeek V4 (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Gemma 4 E2B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: DeepSeek V4 unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Gemma 4 E2B memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Gemma 4 E2B lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, DeepSeek V4 atau Gemma 4 E2B?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, DeepSeek V4 memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API DeepSeek V4 vs Gemma 4 E2B?+

DeepSeek V4 mengenakan biaya $0.30 / $1.20 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Gemma 4 E2B sebesar $0.00 / $0.00. Secara keseluruhan, Gemma 4 E2B lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

DeepSeek V4 mendukung konteks 1M token dibandingkan 131.1K token pada Gemma 4 E2B, sementara Gemma 4 E2B unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

DeepSeek V4 vs Gemma 4 E2B

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

DeepSeek V4

Gemma 4 E2B

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

DeepSeek V4 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Gemma 4 E2B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Spesifikasi Teknis

DeepSeek V4 vs Gemma 4 E2B: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Kesimpulan

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Related reading