Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Grok 4.7 de xAI y DeepSeek V4.1-Flash de DeepSeek compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. Grok 4.7 ofrece una ventana de contexto de 500K tokens a $2.00/$6.00 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que DeepSeek V4.1-Flash ofrece 1M tokens de contexto a $0.30/$1.20 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
xAI

Grok 4.7

Modelo Insignia de Frontera

Grok 4.7 de xAI es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento empresarial de frontera, programación avanzada y flujos de producción, con ventana de contexto de 500K, velocidad de 110 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 46/100 y tarifa de $2

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

500K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

77.2%

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash de DeepSeek es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 1M, velocidad de 110 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 58/1

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.2%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is 5.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 500K tokens).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is faster at 110 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • Grok 4.7 leads on SWE-bench coding (77.2% vs 74.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaracterísticaGrok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4658
Provider
xAIDeepSeek
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$6.00 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.35 / 1M$0.18 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
500K tokens~750 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K384K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
110 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
77.2%74.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
78.5%90.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.50 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código
Grok 4.7
+3.0% SWE-bench lead
Costo
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
5.9x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
+0% faster generation
Contexto
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
1M tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Grok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

77.2%vs74.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

78.5%vs90.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.6%vs89.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1465ptsvs1455pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

15.2%vs16.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

38%vs31.2%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

52.4%vs48%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

76.5%vs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

91.2%vs92.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

89.5%vs93%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

110 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Grok 4.70.62s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash0.46s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Grok 4.75.17s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash5.01s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Grok 4.7 Monthly API Bill
$9.15 / month
$2/1M in · $6/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash Monthly API Bill
$1.54 / month
$0.3/1M in · $1.2/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash saves approximately $7.61 / month (83%) under this workload.5.9x Savings

Grok 4.7 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 500K con hasta 66K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 77.2% · GPQA Diamond 78.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 110 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 620 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($2/$6 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 1M con hasta 384K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 74.2% · GPQA Diamond 90.9%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 110 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 460 ms
  • Pesos abiertos (763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode )) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGrok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.68$0.27
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
46K58K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
23K28K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaracterísticaGrok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Official API Model ID (SDK)grok-4-7-latestdeepseek-reasoner
API ProtocolxAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026June 2026
Architecture2.1T Multimodal Sparse MoECausal Encoder-Decoder (20 enc + 20 dec layers)
Parameters2.1T (MoE)763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 500K windowFlat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.5/1M tokensAutomatic prefix caching at $0.006/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxReal-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code ExecutionSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 473 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1640 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationxAI Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Grok 4.7 or DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is more intelligent. It scores 58 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is cheaper to run?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is cheaper at $0.18 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.35 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.46s compared with 0.62s.

Which model has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 500K tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto Grok 4.7 (Ideal para razonamiento empresarial de frontera, programación avanzada y flujos de producción, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como DeepSeek V4.1-Flash (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: DeepSeek V4.1-Flash lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Grok 4.7 ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y DeepSeek V4.1-Flash resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Grok 4.7 o DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Grok 4.7 frente a DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

Grok 4.7 cuesta $2.00 / $6.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que DeepSeek V4.1-Flash cuesta $0.30 / $1.20. En costo combinado, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

Grok 4.7 cuenta con 500K tokens de contexto frente a 1M tokens de DeepSeek V4.1-Flash. En velocidad de inferencia, Grok 4.7 ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de xAI y DeepSeek, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).