Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Small 4

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Gemma 4 31BProfile

Mistral Small 4Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Google

Gemma 4 31B

Razonamiento de Pesos Abiertos

Gemma 4 31B de Google es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento de cadena de pensamiento con pesos abiertos y alta eficiencia algorítmica, con ventana de contexto de 262K, velocidad de 80 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 81/100 y tar

Intelligence Index81 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

68.5%

Mistral AI

Mistral Small 4

Inferencia Ultrarrápida

Mistral Small 4 de Mistral AI es un modelo de IA diseñado para interacción en tiempo real, baja latencia y enrutamiento de alto volumen, con ventana de contexto de 256K, velocidad de 120 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 48/100 y tarifa d

Intelligence Index48 / 100

Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

44.5%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

Gemma 4 31B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window (262K vs 256K tokens).
Mistral Small 4 is faster at 120 tok/s vs 80 tok/s.
Gemma 4 31B leads on SWE-bench coding (68.5% vs 44.5%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Característica	Gemma 4 31B	Mistral Small 4
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	81	48
Provider	Google	Mistral AI
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.10 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.30 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$0.07 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text	256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	33K	16K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	80 tok/s	120 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	68.5%	44.5%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	77%	56%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.03 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework

Código

Gemma 4 31B

+24.0% SWE-bench lead

Costo

Gemma 4 31B

1.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Velocidad

Mistral Small 4

+50% faster generation

Contexto

Gemma 4 31B

262.1K tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemma 4 31BMistral Small 4

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

68.5%vs44.5%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

77%vs56%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

84.8%vs78%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1410ptsvs1315pts

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs38%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

86%vs66%

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs80%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

80 tok/s vs120 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Gemma 4 31B0.48s

Mistral Small 40.34s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Gemma 4 31B6.73s

Mistral Small 44.51s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Gemma 4 31B Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Mistral Small 4 Monthly API Bill

$0.47 / month

$0.1/1M in · $0.3/1M out

Gemma 4 31B saves approximately $0.47 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Gemma 4 31B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Ventana de contexto de 262K con hasta 33K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 68.5% · GPQA Diamond 77%)
Rendimiento ágil de 80 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 480 ms
Pesos abiertos (31B) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Mistral Small 4 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Ventana de contexto de 256K con hasta 16K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 44.5% · GPQA Diamond 56%)
Rendimiento ágil de 120 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 340 ms
Pesos abiertos (24B) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Gemma 4 31B	Mistral Small 4
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$0.12
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	12K	28K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	6K	12K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Característica	Gemma 4 31B	Mistral Small 4
Official API Model ID (SDK)	models/gemma-4-31b	mistral-small-4-latest
API Protocol	Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2026-04	2026-03
Knowledge Cutoff	January 2026	January 2026
Architecture	Dense open reasoning transformer with native thinking	Next-Gen Compact Multimodal Transformer
Parameters	31B	24B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 256K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Cached input at $0.03/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 67 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 15 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 52 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Small 4: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemma 4 31B or Mistral Small 4?

Gemma 4 31B is more intelligent. It scores 81 compared with 48 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Mistral Small 4 is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 80 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.07 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Mistral Small 4 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.34s compared with 0.48s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 256K tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto Gemma 4 31B (Ideal para razonamiento de cadena de pensamiento con pesos abiertos y alta eficiencia algorítmica, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Mistral Small 4 (Ideal para interacción en tiempo real, baja latencia y enrutamiento de alto volumen, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Gemma 4 31B lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Mistral Small 4 ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Gemma 4 31B resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Gemma 4 31B o Mistral Small 4?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Gemma 4 31B obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Gemma 4 31B frente a Mistral Small 4?+

Gemma 4 31B cuesta $0.00 / $0.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Mistral Small 4 cuesta $0.10 / $0.30. En costo combinado, Gemma 4 31B es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

Gemma 4 31B cuenta con 262.1K tokens de contexto frente a 256K tokens de Mistral Small 4. En velocidad de inferencia, Mistral Small 4 ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Small 4

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Gemma 4 31B

Mistral Small 4

¿Quién gana en cada área?

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Gemma 4 31B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Mistral Small 4 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Especificaciones Técnicas

Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Small 4: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Veredicto

Preguntas frecuentes

Related reading