Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Gemini 4 Argon de Google y Claude Fable 5.1 de Anthropic compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. Gemini 4 Argon ofrece una ventana de contexto de 1M tokens a $2.00/$10.00 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que Claude Fable 5.1 ofrece 1M tokens de contexto a $10.00/$50.00 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 4 Argon

IA Multimodal Nativa

Gemini 4 Argon de Google es un modelo de IA diseñado para comprensión multimodal nativa de texto e imagen y análisis visual de documentos, con ventana de contexto de 1M, velocidad de 115 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 97/100 y tarifa d

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1

Modelo Insignia de Frontera

Claude Fable 5.1 de Anthropic es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento empresarial de frontera, programación avanzada y flujos de producción, con ventana de contexto de 1M, velocidad de 65 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 82/100 y t

Intelligence Index82 / 100
Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$50.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

83.8%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • Gemini 4 Argon is 5.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 leads on SWE-bench coding (83.8% vs 81.9%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaracterísticaGemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.1
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9782
Provider
GoogleAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$50.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.47 / 1M$7.17 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
1000K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
115 tok/s65 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
81.9%83.8%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
81.5%81.6%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.25 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código
Claude Fable 5.1
+1.9% SWE-bench lead
Costo
Gemini 4 Argon
5.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
Gemini 4 Argon
+77% faster generation
Contexto
Tied
1M tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.1
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

81.9%vs83.8%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

81.5%vs81.6%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

90.8%vs91%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1525ptsvs1510pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

18.9%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

57.4%vs62%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

56.4%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

80.5%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

94.8%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

96.4%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

115 tok/s vs65 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Claude Fable 5.11.45s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s
Claude Fable 5.19.14s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Claude Fable 5.1 Monthly API Bill
$60.38 / month
$10/1M in · $50/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon saves approximately $48.23 / month (80%) under this workload.5.0x Savings

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 1M con hasta 1M tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 115 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 850 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos

Claude Fable 5.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 1M con hasta 128K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 83.8% · GPQA Diamond 81.6%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 65 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 1450 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($10/$50 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.1
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.45$10.97
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
75K72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
36K37K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaracterísticaGemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.1
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-4-argonclaude-fable-5-1-20260901
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffJune 2026June 2026
ArchitecturePathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-ExpertsFrontier Auditable Multimodal Transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL$0.25/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 4 Argon or Claude Fable 5.1?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 82 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper at $1.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.17 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 4 Argon has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 1.45s.

Veredicto

Tanto Gemini 4 Argon (Ideal para comprensión multimodal nativa de texto e imagen y análisis visual de documentos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Claude Fable 5.1 (Ideal para razonamiento empresarial de frontera, programación avanzada y flujos de producción, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Gemini 4 Argon lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Gemini 4 Argon ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Gemini 4 Argon resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Gemini 4 Argon o Claude Fable 5.1?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Gemini 4 Argon obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Gemini 4 Argon frente a Claude Fable 5.1?+

Gemini 4 Argon cuesta $2.00 / $10.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Claude Fable 5.1 cuesta $10.00 / $50.00. En costo combinado, Gemini 4 Argon es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

Gemini 4 Argon cuenta con 1M tokens de contexto frente a 1M tokens de Claude Fable 5.1. En velocidad de inferencia, Gemini 4 Argon ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de Google y Anthropic, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).