Devstral Medium vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Devstral Medium by Mistral AI and GPT-5.1 Codex mini by OpenAI represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, GPT-5.1 Codex mini holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, GPT-5.1 Codex mini is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, GPT-5.1 Codex mini provides an expanded memory horizon with 400K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, GPT-5.1 Codex mini leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Switch & Compare Any Models
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Devstral Medium
Code AgentCommercial flagship software engineering agent fine-tuned for terminal execution, test-driven debugging, and end-to-end repository fixes.
$0.80 / 1M
$2.40 / 1M
128K tokens
51.5%
GPT-5.1 Codex mini
Compact CodexA cheap coding-optimised Codex lane for fast edits and review at scale.
$0.25 / 1M
$2.00 / 1M
400K tokens
55.5%
Key Differences at a Glance
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini is 1.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini has a larger context window (400K vs 128K tokens).
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini is faster at 180 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini leads on SWE-bench coding (55.5% vs 51.5%).
| Feature | Devstral Medium | GPT-5.1 Codex mini |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 52 | 47 |
Provider | Mistral AI | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.80 / 1M | $0.25 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $2.40 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.54 / 1M | $0.27 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 33K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 75 tok/s | 180 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 51.5% | 55.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 62% | 66.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.20 / 1M | $0.03 / 1M |
Who Wins Where?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEmpirical Head-to-Head Benchmark Scores
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latency & Response Time
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Real-Time Interactive Token Cost Simulator
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Devstral Medium · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Purpose-built autonomous agent loop integration with bash and file tools
- Impressive 51.5% SWE-bench Verified score with low token burn
- Superior multi-file consistency and unit test verification
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Proprietary closed-weights API only
- Higher cost than open Devstral Small
GPT-5.1 Codex mini · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Cheap, fast coding assistance
- Good for lint fixes, refactors and review comments
- Retains the 400K context window
- Great for linting, formatting and small refactors
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Struggles on large, interdependent repositories
- Less reliable than full Codex on multi-file refactors
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Devstral Medium | GPT-5.1 Codex mini |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.55 | $0.33 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 38K | 48K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 18K | 23K |
Technical Specifications
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Devstral Medium | GPT-5.1 Codex mini |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | devstral-medium-latest | gpt-5-1-codex-mini |
| API Protocol | Mistral AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2025-07 | 2025-11 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | May 2025 | October 2024 |
| Architecture | High-Capacity Agentic Code Transformer | Compact code-specialised reasoning model |
| Parameters | Confidential (~70B) | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.8/1M in) across full 128K window | Flat rate ($0.25/1M in) across full 400K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.2/1M tokens | Automatic prefix caching at $0.025/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Mistral AI Production Safety & Alignment Verified | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Devstral Medium vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini: Quick Answers
Which is more intelligent, Devstral Medium or GPT-5.1 Codex mini?
Devstral Medium is more intelligent. It scores 52 compared with 47 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini is faster, generating 180 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini is cheaper at $0.27 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.54 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Devstral Medium has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.50s compared with 0.72s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini has a larger context window, supporting 400K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Verdict
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Devstral Medium if your priority is Autonomous bug-fixing bots, CI/CD pipeline automation, and enterprise repository refactoring. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose GPT-5.1 Codex mini if your workflow prioritizes High-volume code automation and inline review. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Frequently asked questions
How does Devstral Medium compare to GPT-5.1 Codex mini in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Devstral Medium costs $0.80 per 1M input tokens and $2.40 per 1M output tokens, whereas GPT-5.1 Codex mini costs $0.25 input and $2.00 output. Overall, GPT-5.1 Codex mini is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Devstral Medium or GPT-5.1 Codex mini?+
Devstral Medium supports a context window of 128K tokens (~96k words), while GPT-5.1 Codex mini supports 400K tokens (~300k words). Therefore, GPT-5.1 Codex mini can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Devstral Medium or GPT-5.1 Codex mini?+
Devstral Medium scores 51.5% on SWE-bench Verified while GPT-5.1 Codex mini scores 55.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, GPT-5.1 Codex mini holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Devstral Medium and GPT-5.1 Codex mini?+
Devstral Medium features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, GPT-5.1 Codex mini provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Devstral Medium and GPT-5.1 Codex mini?+
Devstral Medium generates approximately 75 tokens per second, while GPT-5.1 Codex mini delivers 180 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, GPT-5.1 Codex mini provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Devstral Medium and GPT-5.1 Codex mini to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to GPT-5.1 Codex mini to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Devstral Medium. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Devstral Small vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonCompare
- GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs GPT-5-Codex: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonCompare
- GPT-5.1 Codex vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonCompare
- North Mini Code vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonCompare
- Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct vs Devstral Medium: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonCompare
- Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Devstral Medium: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonCompare
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sources: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs