Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Geprüft vom GetInfoUs-ForschungsteamZuletzt geprüft: October 2026Redaktionelle Richtlinien
Teilen
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Qwen3.7 Max von Alibaba und Qwen3.6 Max Preview von Alibaba gehören zu den führenden KI-Modellen. Qwen3.7 Max bietet ein Kontextfenster von 1M Tokens bei API-Preisen von $1.80/$7.20 pro 1M Tokens, während Qwen3.6 Max Preview 262.1K Tokens Kontext zu $1.50/$6.00 pro 1M Tokens bereitstellt. Hier finden Sie den vollständigen Benchmark-, Latenz- und Kostenvergleich.

Direktvergleich (VS)

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Alibaba

Qwen3.7 Max

Autonomes Agenten-Modell

Qwen3.7 Max von Alibaba ist ein KI-Modell für autonome Agenten-Workflows, zuverlässiges Tool-Calling und mehrstufige Automatisierung mit 1M Kontextfenster, 80 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 92/100 und $1.8/$7.2 pro 1M Token.

Intelligence Index92 / 100
Input Token:

$1.80 / 1M

Output Token:

$7.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

73.5%

Alibaba

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Frontier-Flaggschiff-Modell

Qwen3.6 Max Preview von Alibaba ist ein KI-Modell für anspruchsvolles Enterprise-Reasoning, Softwareentwicklung und produktive KI-Workflows mit 262K Kontextfenster, 75 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 90/100 und $1.5/$6 pro 1M

Intelligence Index90 / 100
Input Token:

$1.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

70%

Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick

  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview is 1.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Qwen3.7 Max has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
  • Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 80 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
  • Qwen3.7 Max leads on SWE-bench coding (73.5% vs 70.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.6 Max Preview
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9290
Provider
AlibabaAlibaba
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.80 / 1M$1.50 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$7.20 / 1M$6.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.21 / 1M$1.01 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
32K16K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
80 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
73.5%70%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
78.5%76%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.18 / 1M$0.15 / 1M

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Qwen3.7 Max
+3.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
1.2x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Qwen3.7 Max
+7% faster generation
Context
Qwen3.7 Max
1M tokens window

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3.6 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

73.5%vs70%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

78.5%vs76%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.5%vs87.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1470ptsvs1445pts
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

86%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

80 tok/s vs75 tok/s

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Qwen3.7 Max0.58s
Qwen3.6 Max Preview0.54s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Qwen3.7 Max6.83s
Qwen3.6 Max Preview7.21s

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Qwen3.7 Max Monthly API Bill
$9.45 / month
$1.8/1M in · $7.2/1M out
Qwen3.6 Max Preview Monthly API Bill
$7.88 / month
$1.5/1M in · $6/1M out
Qwen3.6 Max Preview saves approximately $1.58 / month (17%) under this workload.1.2x Savings

Qwen3.7 Max · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 1M Kontextfenster und bis zu 32K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 73.5% · GPQA Diamond 78.5%)
  • Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 80 Token/Sekunde bei nur 580 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
  • Effiziente API-Struktur ($1.8/$7.2 pro 1M Token) inklusive Prompt-Caching, Tool-Calling und strikter JSON-Ausgabe
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Proprietäres Cloud-Modell ohne Möglichkeit zum lokalen Download der Modellgewichte
  • Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Qwen3.6 Max Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 262K Kontextfenster und bis zu 16K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 70% · GPQA Diamond 76%)
  • Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 75 Token/Sekunde bei nur 540 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
  • Effiziente API-Struktur ($1.5/$6 pro 1M Token) inklusive Prompt-Caching, Tool-Calling und strikter JSON-Ausgabe
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Proprietäres Cloud-Modell ohne Möglichkeit zum lokalen Download der Modellgewichte
  • Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.6 Max Preview
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.38$0.32
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
32K28K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
14K11K

Technische Spezifikationen

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.6 Max Preview
Official API Model ID (SDK)qwen3-7-max-instructqwen3-6-max-preview-instruct
API ProtocolAlibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)Alibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2026-052026-04
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026March 2026
ArchitectureNext-Generation Deep Frontier Reasoning TransformerHigh-Scale Frontier Agentic Transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.8/1M in) across full 1000K windowFlat rate ($1.5/1M in) across full 262K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.18/1M tokensCached input at $0.15/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAlibaba Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedAlibaba Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.7 Max is more intelligent. It scores 92 compared with 90 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Qwen3.7 Max is faster, generating 80 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper at $1.01 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.21 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.54s compared with 0.58s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Fazit

Sowohl Qwen3.7 Max (Optimal für autonome Agenten-Workflows, zuverlässiges Tool-Calling und mehrstufige Automatisierung, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) als auch Qwen3.6 Max Preview (Optimal für anspruchsvolles Enterprise-Reasoning, Softwareentwicklung und produktive KI-Workflows, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) überzeugen im Produktionseinsatz: Qwen3.7 Max führt bei komplexem Reasoning und Coding, Qwen3.7 Max liefert den höheren Token-Durchsatz und Qwen3.6 Max Preview ist die kosteneffizienteste Wahl für große API-Workloads.

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Welches Modell ist besser für Coding und Reasoning – Qwen3.7 Max oder Qwen3.6 Max Preview?+

Im Gesamt-Intelligenzindex und bei Software-Benchmarks liegt Qwen3.7 Max vorn. Prüfen Sie oben die SWE-bench- und GPQA-Werte für Ihren Anwendungsfall.

Wie unterscheiden sich die API-Preise von Qwen3.7 Max und Qwen3.6 Max Preview?+

Qwen3.7 Max kostet $1.80 / $7.20 pro 1M Input-/Output-Tokens, Qwen3.6 Max Preview liegt bei $1.50 / $6.00. Beim gewichteten Gesamtpreis ist Qwen3.6 Max Preview günstiger.

Welches Modell hat das größere Kontextfenster und die höhere Geschwindigkeit?+

Qwen3.7 Max bietet 1M Tokens Kontext gegenüber 262.1K Tokens bei Qwen3.6 Max Preview. Bei der Generierungsgeschwindigkeit liegt Qwen3.7 Max vorn.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Offizielle Quellen: Offizielle API-Dokumentation von Alibaba und Alibaba, Systemkarten und unabhängige Benchmark-Auswertungen (2026).