Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Geprüft vom GetInfoUs-ForschungsteamZuletzt geprüft: October 2026Redaktionelle Richtlinien

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Qwen3.5 122B-A10BProfile

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Alibaba

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Nativ Multimodale KI

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B von Alibaba ist ein KI-Modell für nativ multimodale Verarbeitung von Text und Bild sowie visuelle Dokumentenanalyse mit 262K Kontextfenster, 78 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 82/100 und kostenlosem Open-Wei

Intelligence Index82 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Alibaba

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

Open-Weights-Basismodell

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) von Alibaba ist ein KI-Modell für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität mit 131K Kontextfenster, 95 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 82/100 und kostenlosem

Intelligence Index82 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

46%

Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick

Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has a larger context window (262K vs 131K tokens).
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is faster at 95 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Qwen3.5 122B-A10B	Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	82	82
Provider	Alibaba	Alibaba
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text	131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	16K	16K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	78 tok/s	95 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	N/A	46%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	65.5%	68.5%

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

Tied

Identical monthly runtime cost

Speed

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

+22% faster generation

Context

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

262.1K tokens window

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs46%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

65.5%vs68.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

80.5%vs80%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1350ptsvs1345pts

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs82%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

78 tok/s vs95 tok/s

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B0.51s

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)0.54s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B6.92s

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)5.80s

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B · Strengths & Key Advantages

262K Kontextfenster und bis zu 16K maximale Output-Token (GPQA Diamond 65.5% · MMLU-Pro 80.5%)
Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 78 Token/Sekunde bei nur 510 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
Offene Modellgewichte (122B total (10B MoE)) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) · Strengths & Key Advantages

131K Kontextfenster und bis zu 16K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 46% · GPQA Diamond 68.5%)
Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 95 Token/Sekunde bei nur 540 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
Offene Modellgewichte (80B total (3B MoE)) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Qwen3.5 122B-A10B	Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$0.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	18K	20K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	5K	12K

Technische Spezifikationen

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Qwen3.5 122B-A10B	Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Official API Model ID (SDK)	qwen3-5-122b-a10b-instruct	qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking-instruct
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2026-02	2025-09
Knowledge Cutoff	December 2025	August 2025
Architecture	Efficient Open Multimodal MoE Transformer	Deliberate Reasoning Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters	122B total (10B active MoE)	80B total (3B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 76 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 262 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 50 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 172 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text, vision	text
Output Modalities	text	text

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Which model is faster?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is faster, generating 95 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.51s compared with 0.54s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.

Fazit

Sowohl Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (Optimal für nativ multimodale Verarbeitung von Text und Bild sowie visuelle Dokumentenanalyse, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) als auch Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (Optimal für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) überzeugen im Produktionseinsatz: Qwen3.5 122B-A10B führt bei komplexem Reasoning und Coding, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) liefert den höheren Token-Durchsatz und Qwen3.5 122B-A10B ist die kosteneffizienteste Wahl für große API-Workloads.

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Welches Modell ist besser für Coding und Reasoning – Qwen3.5 122B-A10B oder Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)?+

Im Gesamt-Intelligenzindex und bei Software-Benchmarks liegt Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vorn. Prüfen Sie oben die SWE-bench- und GPQA-Werte für Ihren Anwendungsfall.

Wie unterscheiden sich die API-Preise von Qwen3.5 122B-A10B und Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)?+

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B kostet $0.00 / $0.00 pro 1M Input-/Output-Tokens, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) liegt bei $0.00 / $0.00. Beim gewichteten Gesamtpreis ist Qwen3.5 122B-A10B günstiger.

Welches Modell hat das größere Kontextfenster und die höhere Geschwindigkeit?+

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B bietet 262.1K Tokens Kontext gegenüber 131.1K Tokens bei Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking). Bei der Generierungsgeschwindigkeit liegt Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vorn.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Technische Spezifikationen

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Fazit

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Related reading