Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Claude Opus 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Geprüft vom GetInfoUs-ForschungsteamZuletzt geprüft: October 2026Redaktionelle Richtlinien
Teilen
Related topics (4)
NVIDIAAnthropicopen-sourceflagship

Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B by NVIDIA against Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Direktvergleich (VS)

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Open-Weights-Modell

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B von NVIDIA ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 262K Token zu API-Preisen von $0.1/1M Input- und $0.25/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.

Intelligence Index45 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

38%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5

Deep-Reasoning-Modell

Claude Opus 5.5 von Anthropic ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 1M Token zu API-Preisen von $4.0/1M Input- und $20.0/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

84.6%

Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick

  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 60.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is faster at 130 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 38.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BClaude Opus 5.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4594
Provider
NVIDIAAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.25 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.06 / 1M$3.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
130 tok/s78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
38%84.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
54%82.3%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$0.40 / 1M

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5.5
+46.6% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
60.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
+67% faster generation
Context
Claude Opus 5.5
1M tokens window

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BClaude Opus 5.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

38%vs84.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

54%vs82.3%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75%vs91.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1285ptsvs1507pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs19.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

34%vs66.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs58.7%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs83.1%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

64%vs95.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

76%vs92.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

130 tok/s vs78 tok/s

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B0.32s
Claude Opus 5.51.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B4.17s
Claude Opus 5.57.81s

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Monthly API Bill
$0.41 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.25/1M out
Claude Opus 5.5 Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B saves approximately $24.20 / month (98%) under this workload.60.7x Savings

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Fortschrittliche Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (30B Total / 3B Active)-Architektur von NVIDIA mit 262K Token Kontextfenster
  • Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($0.1/1M Input, $0.25/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
  • Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
  • Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering

Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Fortschrittliche Extended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer-Architektur von Anthropic mit 1M Token Kontextfenster
  • Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($4.0/1M Input, $20.0/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
  • Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
  • Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BClaude Opus 5.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.12$3.85
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
28K68K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
10K42K

Technische Spezifikationen

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BClaude Opus 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bclaude-opus-5-5-20260901
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2025-122026-09
Knowledge CutoffOctober 2025June 2026
ArchitectureSparse Mixture-of-Experts (30B Total / 3B Active)Extended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer
Parameters30B (3B active MoE)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 262K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.02/1M tokens$0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 65 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Claude Opus 5.5: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 45 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is faster, generating 130 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.06 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.32s compared with 1.40s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Fazit

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for unternehmensautomatisierung, software-engineering, autonome ki-agenten und nvidia-produktionssysteme, or choose Claude Opus 5.5 for unternehmensautomatisierung, software-engineering, autonome ki-agenten und anthropic-produktionssysteme.

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Claude Opus 5.5?+

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.1/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/1M input and $20/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Claude Opus 5.5?+

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B supports 262K tokens whereas Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Offizielle Quellen: NVIDIA & Anthropic Official Documentation