Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Gemini 3.6 Flash by Google against GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Deep-Reasoning-ModellGemini 3.6 Flash von Google ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 1.0M Token zu API-Preisen von $0.75/1M Input- und $3.75/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$0.75 / 1M
$3.75 / 1M
1.05M tokens
72%
GPT-6.1 Sol
Deep-Reasoning-ModellGPT-6.1 Sol von OpenAI ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 1M Token zu API-Preisen von $2.0/1M Input- und $10.0/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
82.3%
Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick
- Gemini 3.6 Flash is 2.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
- Gemini 3.6 Flash is faster at 185 tok/s vs 120 tok/s.
- GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 72.0%).
| Feature | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 84 | 94 |
Provider | OpenAI | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.75 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $3.75 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.66 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 66K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 185 tok/s | 120 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 72% | 82.3% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 82.4% | 80.8% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.19 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?
At-a-glance decision frameworkGeprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenz & Antwortzeit
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemini 3.6 Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche Enhanced multimodal mixture-of-experts-Architektur von Google mit 1.0M Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($0.75/1M Input, $3.75/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche Near-Astra unified reasoning model-Architektur von OpenAI mit 1M Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($2.0/1M Input, $10.0/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.02 | $2.05 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 39K | 62K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 19K | 36K |
Technische Spezifikationen
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemini-3-6-flash | gpt-6-1-sol |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2026-07 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | March 2026 | April 2026 |
| Architecture | Enhanced multimodal mixture-of-experts | Near-Astra unified reasoning model |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1875/1M with configurable TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?
GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 84 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is faster, generating 185 tokens per second compared with 120 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.66 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.37s compared with 1.12s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1M tokens.
Fazit
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash for unternehmensautomatisierung, software-engineering, autonome ki-agenten und google-produktionssysteme, or choose GPT-6.1 Sol for unternehmensautomatisierung, software-engineering, autonome ki-agenten und openai-produktionssysteme.
Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?+
Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75/1M input and $3.75/1M output tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?+
Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1.0M tokens whereas GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Offizielle Quellen: Google & OpenAI Official Documentation