Gemini 2.5 Computer Use vs Gemini 4 Argon
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Gemini 2.5 Computer Use by Google against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
Autonomes Agenten-ModellGemini 2.5 Computer Use von Google ist ein KI-Modell für autonome Agenten-Workflows, zuverlässiges Tool-Calling und mehrstufige Automatisierung mit 128K Kontextfenster, 85 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 65/100 und $1.5/$8 pr
$1.50 / 1M
$8.00 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
Gemini 4 Argon
Nativ Multimodale KIGemini 4 Argon von Google ist ein KI-Modell für nativ multimodale Verarbeitung von Text und Bild sowie visuelle Dokumentenanalyse mit 1M Kontextfenster, 115 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 97/100 und $2/$10 pro 1M Token.
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
81.9%
Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use is 1.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 128K tokens).
- Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
| Feature | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 65 | 97 |
Provider | ||
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.50 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $8.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $1.36 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 1000K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 115 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 81.9% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 81.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.38 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenz & Antwortzeit
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 128K Kontextfenster und bis zu 16K maximale Output-Token (Arena Elo 1365)
- Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 85 Token/Sekunde bei nur 650 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
- Effiziente API-Struktur ($1.5/$8 pro 1M Token) inklusive Prompt-Caching, Tool-Calling und strikter JSON-Ausgabe
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Proprietäres Cloud-Modell ohne Möglichkeit zum lokalen Download der Modellgewichte
- Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen
Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 1M Kontextfenster und bis zu 1M maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
- Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 115 Token/Sekunde bei nur 850 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
- Effiziente API-Struktur ($2/$10 pro 1M Token) inklusive Prompt-Caching, Tool-Calling und strikter JSON-Ausgabe
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Proprietäres Cloud-Modell ohne Möglichkeit zum lokalen Download der Modellgewichte
- Bei hohem Anfragevolumen empfiehlt sich der Einsatz von Prompt-Caching und Batch-API zur Kostenoptimierung
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.15 | $2.45 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 15K | 75K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 6K | 36K |
Technische Spezifikationen
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemini-2-5-computer-use | models/gemini-4-argon |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2025-10 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | June 2025 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Action-grounded vision-language agent model | Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($1.5/1M in) across full 128K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.375/1M with configurable TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use vs Gemini 4 Argon: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use or Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 65 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use is cheaper at $1.36 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.65s compared with 0.85s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Fazit
Choose Gemini 2.5 Computer Use for optimal für autonome agenten-workflows, zuverlässiges tool-calling und mehrstufige automatisierung, enterprise-rag-systeme und skalierbare api-pipelines., or choose Gemini 4 Argon for optimal für nativ multimodale verarbeitung von text und bild sowie visuelle dokumentenanalyse, enterprise-rag-systeme und skalierbare api-pipelines..
Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use costs $1.5/1M input and $8/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use supports 128K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs. Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- Aion-3.0 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- Aion-Mini vs. Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- Aya Expanse 32B vs. Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- Aya Expanse 8B vs. Command R+: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- Aya Expanse 8B vs. Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Offizielle Quellen: Google & Google Official Documentation