Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Small 4
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Gemma 4 31B by Google and Mistral Small 4 by Mistral AI represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Gemma 4 31B holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Gemma 4 31B is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Gemma 4 31B provides an expanded memory horizon with 262K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Mistral Small 4 leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
切换并对比任意模型
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Gemma 4 31B
开源权重模型Google 推出的 Gemma 4 31B 人工智能模型，具备 262K 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $0/百万 Token，输出价格为 $0/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
262.1K tokens
68.5%
Mistral Small 4
开源权重模型Mistral AI 推出的 Mistral Small 4 人工智能模型，具备 256K 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $0.15/百万 Token，输出价格为 $0.6/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$0.10 / 1M
$0.30 / 1M
256K tokens
44.5%
核心差异一览
- Gemma 4 31B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window (262K vs 256K tokens).
- Mistral Small 4 is faster at 120 tok/s vs 80 tok/s.
- Gemma 4 31B leads on SWE-bench coding (68.5% vs 44.5%).
| Feature | Gemma 4 31B | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 81 | 48 |
Provider | Mistral AI | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.30 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.07 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text | 256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 33K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 80 tok/s | 120 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 68.5% | 44.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 77% | 56% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.03 / 1M |
各项指标谁更胜一筹？
At-a-glance decision framework权威基准测试得分对比
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
延迟与响应速度
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
实时 Token 成本模拟器
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemma 4 31B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 Google 研发的高精度 Dense open reasoning transformer with native thinking 架构，支持 262K 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $0/1M，输出 $0/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
Mistral Small 4 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 Mistral AI 研发的高精度 Next-Gen Compact Multimodal Transformer 架构，支持 256K 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $0.15/1M，输出 $0.6/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemma 4 31B | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.12 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 12K | 28K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 6K | 12K |
技术规格参数
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemma 4 31B | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemma-4-31b | mistral-small-4-latest |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-03 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | January 2026 | January 2026 |
| Architecture | Dense open reasoning transformer with native thinking | Next-Gen Compact Multimodal Transformer |
| Parameters | 31B | 24B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 256K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Cached input at $0.03/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 67 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 15 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 52 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Small 4: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemma 4 31B or Mistral Small 4?
Gemma 4 31B is more intelligent. It scores 81 compared with 48 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Mistral Small 4 is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 80 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemma 4 31B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.07 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Mistral Small 4 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.34s compared with 0.48s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 256K tokens.
综合结论
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Gemma 4 31B if your priority is Private enterprise reasoning servers, local software development, and deep research. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Mistral Small 4 if your workflow prioritizes High-volume agent orchestration, low-cost document parsing, and edge deployments. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
常见问题 (FAQ)
How does Gemma 4 31B compare to Mistral Small 4 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Gemma 4 31B costs $0.00 per 1M input tokens and $0.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas Mistral Small 4 costs $0.10 input and $0.30 output. Overall, Gemma 4 31B is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Gemma 4 31B or Mistral Small 4?+
Gemma 4 31B supports a context window of 262K tokens (~197k words), while Mistral Small 4 supports 256K tokens (~192k words). Therefore, Gemma 4 31B can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Gemma 4 31B or Mistral Small 4?+
Gemma 4 31B scores 68.5% on SWE-bench Verified while Mistral Small 4 scores 44.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, Gemma 4 31B holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 4?+
Gemma 4 31B features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Mistral Small 4 provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 4?+
Gemma 4 31B generates approximately 80 tokens per second, while Mistral Small 4 delivers 120 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Mistral Small 4 provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 4 to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Gemma 4 31B to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Mistral Small 4. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Gemma 4 31B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 3.3 70B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Gemma 4 E2B vs Gemma 4 31B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Mistral Small 4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Mistral Small 4 vs GPT-4.1 mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Mistral Small 4: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
数据来源: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs