Aya Vision 32B vs DeepSeek-V3-0324
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Aya Vision 32B by Cohere and DeepSeek-V3-0324 by DeepSeek represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, DeepSeek-V3-0324 holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Aya Vision 32B is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, DeepSeek-V3-0324 provides an expanded memory horizon with 128K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Aya Vision 32B leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
切换并对比任意模型
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Aya Vision 32B
开源权重模型Cohere 推出的 Aya Vision 32B 人工智能模型，具备 16K 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $0.35/百万 Token，输出价格为 $0.8/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$0.35 / 1M
$0.80 / 1M
16K tokens
32%
DeepSeek-V3-0324
开源权重模型DeepSeek 推出的 DeepSeek-V3-0324 人工智能模型，具备 128K 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $0.27/百万 Token，输出价格为 $1.1/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$0.27 / 1M
$1.10 / 1M
128K tokens
52.4%
核心差异一览
- Aya Vision 32B is 1.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- DeepSeek-V3-0324 has a larger context window (128K vs 16K tokens).
- Aya Vision 32B is faster at 75 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
- DeepSeek-V3-0324 leads on SWE-bench coding (52.4% vs 32.0%).
| Feature | Aya Vision 32B | DeepSeek-V3-0324 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 45 | 48 |
Provider | Cohere | DeepSeek |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.35 / 1M | $0.27 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.80 / 1M | $1.10 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.21 / 1M | $0.21 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 16K tokens~24 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 75 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 32% | 52.4% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 51.5% | 63.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.08 / 1M | $0.07 / 1M |
各项指标谁更胜一筹？
At-a-glance decision framework权威基准测试得分对比
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
延迟与响应速度
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
实时 Token 成本模拟器
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Aya Vision 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 Cohere 研发的高精度 High-Capacity Multilingual VLM 架构，支持 16K 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $0.35/1M，输出 $0.8/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
DeepSeek-V3-0324 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 DeepSeek 研发的高精度 671B Mixture-of-Experts (37B active) 架构，支持 128K 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $0.27/1M，输出 $1.1/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Aya Vision 32B | DeepSeek-V3-0324 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.22 | $0.18 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 25K | 45K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
技术规格参数
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Aya Vision 32B | DeepSeek-V3-0324 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | aya-vision-32b | deepseek-chat |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-03 | 2025-03 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | January 2025 | January 2025 |
| Architecture | High-Capacity Multilingual VLM | 671B Mixture-of-Experts (37B active) |
| Parameters | 32B | 671B (37B active MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.35/1M in) across full 16K window | Flat rate ($0.27/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.08/1M tokens | Automatic prefix caching at $0.07/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 416 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1443 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Aya Vision 32B vs DeepSeek-V3-0324: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Aya Vision 32B or DeepSeek-V3-0324?
DeepSeek-V3-0324 is more intelligent. It scores 48 compared with 45 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Aya Vision 32B is faster, generating 75 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Aya Vision 32B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.48s compared with 0.65s.
Which model has a larger context window?
DeepSeek-V3-0324 has a larger context window, supporting 128K tokens compared with 16K tokens.
综合结论
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Aya Vision 32B if your priority is International patent document inspection, global medical chart OCR, and multilingual enterprise analytics. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose DeepSeek-V3-0324 if your workflow prioritizes Cost-sensitive production backends, self-hosted enterprise clusters, and automated batch code translation. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
常见问题 (FAQ)
How does Aya Vision 32B compare to DeepSeek-V3-0324 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Aya Vision 32B costs $0.35 per 1M input tokens and $0.80 per 1M output tokens, whereas DeepSeek-V3-0324 costs $0.27 input and $1.10 output. Overall, DeepSeek-V3-0324 is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Aya Vision 32B or DeepSeek-V3-0324?+
Aya Vision 32B supports a context window of 16K tokens (~12k words), while DeepSeek-V3-0324 supports 128K tokens (~96k words). Therefore, DeepSeek-V3-0324 can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Aya Vision 32B or DeepSeek-V3-0324?+
Aya Vision 32B scores 32% on SWE-bench Verified while DeepSeek-V3-0324 scores 52.4%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, DeepSeek-V3-0324 holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Aya Vision 32B and DeepSeek-V3-0324?+
Aya Vision 32B is optimized for low-latency direct generation. In contrast, DeepSeek-V3-0324 focuses on standard fast inference.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Aya Vision 32B and DeepSeek-V3-0324?+
Aya Vision 32B generates approximately 75 tokens per second, while DeepSeek-V3-0324 delivers 65 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Aya Vision 32B provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Aya Vision 32B and DeepSeek-V3-0324 to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to DeepSeek-V3-0324 to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Aya Vision 32B. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aya Vision 32B vs Aya Vision 8B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Command A vs Aya Vision 32B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- DeepSeek-V3-0324 vs DeepSeek V3: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
数据来源: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs