GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Aya Vision 32B vs Aya Vision 8B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

由 GetInfoUs 研究团队审核最后审核日期：October 2026编辑政策
分享
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Aya Vision 32B vs Aya Vision 8B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Cohere 的 Aya Vision 32B 与 Cohere 的 Aya Vision 8B 是当前备受关注的两款主力 AI 模型。Aya Vision 32B 提供 16K Token 上下文窗口，API 定价为每百万 Token 输入 $0.35 / 输出 $0.80；而 Aya Vision 8B 提供 16K Token 上下文窗口，定价为每百万 Token 输入 $0.10 / 输出 $0.25。以下为两者的基准测试、延迟与成本全面对比。

模型直接对比 (VS)

切换并对比任意模型

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Cohere

Aya Vision 32B

多语言全球化模型

Cohere 推出的 Aya Vision 32B 是一款针对全球多语言理解、跨语种精准翻译与国际化业务深度优化的大模型，具备 16K 上下文窗口、75 Token/秒生成速度与 45/100 综合智能指数（每百万 Token $0.35 输入 / $0.8 输出）。

Intelligence Index45 / 100
Input Token:

$0.35 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.80 / 1M

Context Window:

16K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

32%

Cohere

Aya Vision 8B

多语言全球化模型

Cohere 推出的 Aya Vision 8B 是一款针对全球多语言理解、跨语种精准翻译与国际化业务深度优化的大模型，具备 16K 上下文窗口、110 Token/秒生成速度与 38/100 综合智能指数（每百万 Token $0.1 输入 / $0.25 输出）。

Intelligence Index38 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Context Window:

16K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

22%

核心差异一览

  • Aya Vision 8B is 3.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Aya Vision 8B is faster at 110 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
  • Aya Vision 32B leads on SWE-bench coding (32.0% vs 22.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureAya Vision 32BAya Vision 8B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4538
Provider
CohereCohere
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.35 / 1M$0.10 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.80 / 1M$0.25 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.21 / 1M$0.07 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
16K tokens~24 A4 pages of text16K tokens~24 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
4K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
75 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
32%22%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
51.5%41%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.08 / 1M$0.03 / 1M

各项指标谁更胜一筹？

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Aya Vision 32B
+10.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Aya Vision 8B
3.2x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Aya Vision 8B
+47% faster generation
Context
Tied
16K tokens window

权威基准测试得分对比

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Aya Vision 32BAya Vision 8B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

32%vs22%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

51.5%vs41%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74%vs64%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1280ptsvs1220pts
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

75 tok/s vs110 tok/s

延迟与响应速度

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Aya Vision 32B0.48s
Aya Vision 8B0.35s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Aya Vision 32B7.15s
Aya Vision 8B4.90s

实时 Token 成本模拟器

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Aya Vision 32B Monthly API Bill
$1.36 / month
$0.35/1M in · $0.8/1M out
Aya Vision 8B Monthly API Bill
$0.42 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.25/1M out
Aya Vision 8B saves approximately $0.94 / month (69%) under this workload.3.2x Savings

Aya Vision 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 提供 16K 上下文窗口与最高 4K 输出容量，核心基准表现优异（SWE-bench Verified 32% · GPQA Diamond 51.5%）
  • 高达 75 Token/秒的生成吞吐量，首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 480 毫秒
  • 开放模型权重 (32B)，支持通过 vLLM、SGLang 或 Ollama 在私有 GPU 集群上本地部署与微调
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 在本地以满血精度运行需要较高的 GPU 显存 (VRAM) 与运维基础设施
  • 在超长链路的前沿科研推导任务上，深度略逊于顶配重型旗舰推理模型

Aya Vision 8B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 提供 16K 上下文窗口与最高 4K 输出容量，核心基准表现优异（SWE-bench Verified 22% · GPQA Diamond 41%）
  • 高达 110 Token/秒的生成吞吐量，首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 350 毫秒
  • 开放模型权重 (8B)，支持通过 vLLM、SGLang 或 Ollama 在私有 GPU 集群上本地部署与微调
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 在本地以满血精度运行需要较高的 GPU 显存 (VRAM) 与运维基础设施
  • 在超长链路的前沿科研推导任务上，深度略逊于顶配重型旗舰推理模型

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricAya Vision 32BAya Vision 8B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.22$0.06
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
25K18K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

技术规格参数

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureAya Vision 32BAya Vision 8B
Official API Model ID (SDK)aya-vision-32baya-vision-8b
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-032025-03
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2025January 2025
ArchitectureHigh-Capacity Multilingual VLMMultilingual Vision-Language Transformer
Parameters32B8B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.35/1M in) across full 16K windowFlat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 16K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.08/1M tokensCached input at $0.03/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Aya Vision 32B vs Aya Vision 8B: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Aya Vision 32B or Aya Vision 8B?

Aya Vision 32B is more intelligent. It scores 45 compared with 38 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Aya Vision 8B is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Aya Vision 8B is cheaper at $0.07 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.21 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Aya Vision 8B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.35s compared with 0.48s.

综合结论

综合来看，Aya Vision 32B（适合：针对全球多语言理解、跨语种精准翻译与国际化业务深度优化的任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。）与 Aya Vision 8B（适合：针对全球多语言理解、跨语种精准翻译与国际化业务深度优化的任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。）各具优势：Aya Vision 32B 在综合智能与编程基准测试中表现更强，Aya Vision 8B 拥有更快的 Token 生成速度，而 Aya Vision 8B 则在规模化 API 部署中具备更高的成本效益。

常见问题 (FAQ)

在编程和深度推理方面，Aya Vision 32B 和 Aya Vision 8B 哪个更强？+

在综合智能指数与编程基准评测中，Aya Vision 32B 表现占优。建议结合上方的 SWE-bench Verified 与 GPQA Diamond 跑分根据具体场景选择。

Aya Vision 32B 与 Aya Vision 8B 的 API 价格哪个更便宜？+

Aya Vision 32B 的 API 价格为输入 $0.35 / 输出 $0.80（每百万 Token），Aya Vision 8B 为输入 $0.10 / 输出 $0.25。综合混合成本来看，Aya Vision 8B 更具性价比。

哪款模型拥有更大的上下文窗口和更快的响应速度？+

Aya Vision 32B 支持 16K Token 上下文窗口，而 Aya Vision 8B 支持 16K Token。在流式生成速度方面，Aya Vision 8B 的吞吐表现更快。

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

数据来源: Cohere 与 Cohere 官方 API 文档、模型发布说明及独立基准测试报告 (2026)。