Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (4)
NVIDIAOpenAIopen-sourceflagship

Compare Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by NVIDIA against GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

IA Agêntica e Uso de Ferramentas

O Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B da NVIDIA é um modelo de IA projetado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, oferecendo janela de contexto de 262K, velocidade de 85 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de

Intelligence Index53 / 100
Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.80 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

51%

OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O GPT-6.1 Sol da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 120 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 94/100 e tar

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.3%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is 9.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
  • GPT-6.1 Sol is faster at 120 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 51.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BGPT-6.1 Sol
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5394
Provider
NVIDIAOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.30 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.80 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.18 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
33K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
85 tok/s120 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
51%82.3%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
64.5%80.8%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.06 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-6.1 Sol
+31.3% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
9.6x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-6.1 Sol
+41% faster generation
Context
GPT-6.1 Sol
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BGPT-6.1 Sol
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

51%vs82.3%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

64.5%vs80.8%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

82.8%vs89.9%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1350ptsvs1519pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.1%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

45%vs63.6%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs54.8%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs79.7%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

74%vs93.5%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

82%vs91%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

85 tok/s vs120 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B0.46s
GPT-6.1 Sol1.12s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B6.34s
GPT-6.1 Sol5.29s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B Monthly API Bill
$1.26 / month
$0.3/1M in · $0.8/1M out
GPT-6.1 Sol Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B saves approximately $10.89 / month (90%) under this workload.9.6x Savings

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 262K com limite máximo de saída de 33K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 51% · GPQA Diamond 64.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 85 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 460 ms
  • Pesos abertos (120B (12B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 82.3% · GPQA Diamond 80.8%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 120 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1120 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BGPT-6.1 Sol
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.38$2.05
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
38K62K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
18K36K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BGPT-6.1 Sol
Official API Model ID (SDK)nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bgpt-6-1-sol
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-032026-09
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026April 2026
ArchitectureHigh-Throughput Sparse MoE (120B Total / 12B Active)Near-Astra unified reasoning model
Parameters120B (12B active MoE)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 262K windowFlat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.06/1M tokensAutomatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 74 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 258 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 53 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6.1 Sol is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is cheaper at $0.18 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.46s compared with 1.12s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Veredito

Choose Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B for indicado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api., or choose GPT-6.1 Sol for indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api..

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.3/1M input and $0.8/1M output tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B supports 262K tokens whereas GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: NVIDIA & OpenAI Official Documentation