Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (4)
NVIDIAGoogleopen-sourceflagship

Compare Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by NVIDIA against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Modelo de Pesos Abertos

O Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B da NVIDIA é um modelo de inteligência artificial com janela de contexto de 262K tokens e preço de API de $0.3/1M na entrada e $0.8/1M na saída, projetado para programação, raciocínio e automação empresarial.

Intelligence Index53 / 100
Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.80 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

51%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Modelo de Raciocínio Profundo

O Gemini 4 Argon da Google é um modelo de inteligência artificial com janela de contexto de 1M tokens e preço de API de $2/1M na entrada e $10/1M na saída, projetado para programação, raciocínio e automação empresarial.

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is 9.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 51.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BGemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5397
Provider
NVIDIAGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.30 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.80 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.18 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
33K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
85 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
51%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
64.5%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.06 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+30.9% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
9.6x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+35% faster generation
Context
Gemini 4 Argon
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BGemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

51%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

64.5%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

82.8%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1350ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

45%vs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

74%vs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

82%vs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

85 tok/s vs115 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B0.46s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B6.34s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B Monthly API Bill
$1.26 / month
$0.3/1M in · $0.8/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B saves approximately $10.89 / month (90%) under this workload.9.6x Savings

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Arquitetura High-Throughput Sparse MoE (120B Total / 12B Active) avançada da NVIDIA com contexto de 262K tokens
  • Excelente relação custo-benefício ($0.3/1M entrada, $0.8/1M saída) e baixa latência
  • Forte desempenho em benchmarks de código, análise lógica e tarefas multilíngues
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Cargas de trabalho com contexto máximo exigem monitoramento de custos de tokens
  • Requer engenharia de prompt adequada para fluxos de trabalho altamente específicos

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Arquitetura Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts avançada da Google com contexto de 1M tokens
  • Excelente relação custo-benefício ($2/1M entrada, $10/1M saída) e baixa latência
  • Forte desempenho em benchmarks de código, análise lógica e tarefas multilíngues
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Cargas de trabalho com contexto máximo exigem monitoramento de custos de tokens
  • Requer engenharia de prompt adequada para fluxos de trabalho altamente específicos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BGemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.38$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
38K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
18K36K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BGemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)nemotron-3-super-120b-a12bmodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2026-032026-09
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026June 2026
ArchitectureHigh-Throughput Sparse MoE (120B Total / 12B Active)Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters120B (12B active MoE)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 262K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.06/1M tokensImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 74 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 258 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Gemini 4 Argon: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 53 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is cheaper at $0.18 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.46s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Veredito

Choose Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B for automação corporativa, engenharia de software, agentes autônomos e pipelines de produção com nvidia, or choose Gemini 4 Argon for automação corporativa, engenharia de software, agentes autônomos e pipelines de produção com google.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.3/1M input and $0.8/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B supports 262K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: NVIDIA & Google Official Documentation