Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Mistral NeMo vs Mixtral 8x22B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Mistral NeMo vs Mixtral 8x22B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Mistral NeMo da Mistral AI e Mixtral 8x22B da Mistral AI são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Mistral NeMo oferece uma janela de contexto de 128K tokens a $0.15/$0.15 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Mixtral 8x22B oferece 65.5K tokens de contexto a $1.20/$1.20 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Mistral NeMo da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 90 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 39/100 e

Intelligence Index39 / 100
Input Token:

$0.15 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.15 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

29%

Mistral AI

Mixtral 8x22B

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Mixtral 8x22B da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 66K, velocidade de 55 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 44/100 e

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

65.5K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

36%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Mistral NeMo is 8.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Mistral NeMo has a larger context window (128K vs 66K tokens).
  • Mistral NeMo is faster at 90 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
  • Mixtral 8x22B leads on SWE-bench coding (36.0% vs 29.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureMistral NeMoMixtral 8x22B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
3944
Provider
Mistral AIMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.15 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.15 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.08 / 1M$0.78 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text65.5K tokens~98 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
90 tok/s55 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
29%36%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
44.5%51.2%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.05 / 1M$0.60 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Mixtral 8x22B
+7.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Mistral NeMo
8.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Mistral NeMo
+64% faster generation
Context
Mistral NeMo
128K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Mistral NeMoMixtral 8x22B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

29%vs36%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

44.5%vs51.2%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

68.2%vs74%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1220ptsvs1260pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

25%vs31%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

50%vs62%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

66%vs68%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

90 tok/s vs55 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Mistral NeMo0.40s
Mixtral 8x22B0.70s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Mistral NeMo5.96s
Mixtral 8x22B9.79s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Mistral NeMo Monthly API Bill
$0.43 / month
$0.15/1M in · $0.15/1M out
Mixtral 8x22B Monthly API Bill
$3.78 / month
$1.2/1M in · $1.2/1M out
Mistral NeMo saves approximately $3.34 / month (88%) under this workload.8.7x Savings

Mistral NeMo · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 29% · GPQA Diamond 44.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 90 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 400 ms
  • Pesos abertos (12B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Mixtral 8x22B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 66K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 36% · GPQA Diamond 51.2%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 55 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 700 ms
  • Pesos abertos (141B total (39B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMistral NeMoMixtral 8x22B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.08$0.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
25K35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureMistral NeMoMixtral 8x22B
Official API Model ID (SDK)mistral-nemo-latestmixtral-8x22b-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2024-072024-04
Knowledge CutoffJuly 2024March 2024
ArchitectureDense Transformer with Tekken TokenizerSparse Mixture-of-Experts (8x22B)
Parameters12B141B total (39B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.15/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($1.2/1M in) across full 66K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.05/1M tokensCached input at $0.6/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 7 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 26 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 87 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 303 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Mistral NeMo vs Mixtral 8x22B: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Mistral NeMo or Mixtral 8x22B?

Mixtral 8x22B is more intelligent. It scores 44 compared with 39 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Mistral NeMo is faster, generating 90 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Mistral NeMo is cheaper at $0.08 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.78 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Mistral NeMo has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.40s compared with 0.70s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Mistral NeMo has a larger context window, supporting 128K tokens compared with 65.5K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Mistral NeMo (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Mixtral 8x22B (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Mixtral 8x22B lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Mistral NeMo oferece geração mais rápida e Mistral NeMo apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Mistral NeMo ou Mixtral 8x22B?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Mixtral 8x22B leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Mistral NeMo ou Mixtral 8x22B?+

O Mistral NeMo custa $0.15 / $0.15 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Mixtral 8x22B custa $1.20 / $1.20. No custo combinado, Mistral NeMo é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Mistral NeMo suporta 128K tokens de contexto contra 65.5K tokens do Mixtral 8x22B, enquanto Mistral NeMo entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Mistral AI e Mistral AI e benchmarks independentes (2026).