Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Mistral Medium 3 da Mistral AI e Mistral Small 3 da Mistral AI são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Mistral Medium 3 oferece uma janela de contexto de 131.1K tokens a $0.40/$2.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Mistral Small 3 oferece 32K tokens de contexto a $0.10/$0.30 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Mistral Medium 3 da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 131K, velocidade de 85 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 47/10

Intelligence Index47 / 100
Input Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

40.5%

Mistral AI

Mistral Small 3

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Mistral Small 3 da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 32K, velocidade de 105 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 41/100

Intelligence Index41 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Context Window:

32K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

31.5%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Mistral Small 3 is 5.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Mistral Medium 3 has a larger context window (131K vs 32K tokens).
  • Mistral Small 3 is faster at 105 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
  • Mistral Medium 3 leads on SWE-bench coding (40.5% vs 31.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureMistral Medium 3Mistral Small 3
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4741
Provider
Mistral AIMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.40 / 1M$0.10 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.35 / 1M$0.09 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text32K tokens~48 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
85 tok/s105 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
40.5%31.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
57.5%46.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.05 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Mistral Medium 3
+9.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Mistral Small 3
5.2x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Mistral Small 3
+24% faster generation
Context
Mistral Medium 3
131.1K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Mistral Medium 3Mistral Small 3
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

40.5%vs31.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

57.5%vs46.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

79.5%vs70.2%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1310ptsvs1238pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

36%vs27%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

68%vs52%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

77%vs64%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

85 tok/s vs105 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Mistral Medium 30.48s
Mistral Small 30.38s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Mistral Medium 36.36s
Mistral Small 35.14s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Mistral Medium 3 Monthly API Bill
$2.55 / month
$0.4/1M in · $2/1M out
Mistral Small 3 Monthly API Bill
$0.50 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.3/1M out
Mistral Small 3 saves approximately $2.06 / month (81%) under this workload.5.2x Savings

Mistral Medium 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 131K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 40.5% · GPQA Diamond 57.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 85 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 480 ms
  • Pesos abertos (Confidential (~70B)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Mistral Small 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 32K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 31.5% · GPQA Diamond 46.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 105 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 380 ms
  • Pesos abertos (24B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMistral Medium 3Mistral Small 3
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.35$0.08
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
35K25K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureMistral Medium 3Mistral Small 3
Official API Model ID (SDK)mistral-medium-3-latestmistral-small-3-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-052025-01
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2025December 2024
ArchitectureEnterprise Multimodal TransformerCompact Dense Transformer
ParametersConfidential (~70B)24B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.4/1M in) across full 131K windowFlat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 32K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.1/1M tokensCached input at $0.05/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 15 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 52 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Mistral Medium 3 or Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Medium 3 is more intelligent. It scores 47 compared with 41 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Mistral Small 3 is faster, generating 105 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.09 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.35 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Mistral Small 3 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 0.48s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Mistral Medium 3 has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 32K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Mistral Medium 3 (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Mistral Small 3 (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Mistral Medium 3 lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Mistral Small 3 oferece geração mais rápida e Mistral Small 3 apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Mistral Medium 3 ou Mistral Small 3?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Mistral Medium 3 leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Mistral Medium 3 ou Mistral Small 3?+

O Mistral Medium 3 custa $0.40 / $2.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Mistral Small 3 custa $0.10 / $0.30. No custo combinado, Mistral Small 3 é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Mistral Medium 3 suporta 131.1K tokens de contexto contra 32K tokens do Mistral Small 3, enquanto Mistral Small 3 entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Mistral AI e Mistral AI e benchmarks independentes (2026).