Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Llama 3.1 8B vs Llama 3.1 70B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Llama 3.1 8B vs Llama 3.1 70B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Llama 3.1 8B da Meta e Llama 3.1 70B da Meta são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Llama 3.1 8B oferece uma janela de contexto de 128K tokens a $0.00/$0.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Llama 3.1 70B oferece 128K tokens de contexto a $0.00/$0.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Meta

Llama 3.1 8B

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Llama 3.1 8B da Meta é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 160 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 60/100 e tarif

Intelligence Index60 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

22%

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Llama 3.1 70B da Meta é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 75 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 75/100 e tarif

Intelligence Index75 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

42%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
  • Llama 3.1 8B is faster at 160 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
  • Llama 3.1 70B leads on SWE-bench coding (42.0% vs 22.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureLlama 3.1 8BLlama 3.1 70B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6075
Provider
MetaMeta
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
160 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
22%42%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
38%52%

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Llama 3.1 70B
+20.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Tied
Identical monthly runtime cost
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B
+113% faster generation
Context
Tied
128K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Llama 3.1 8BLlama 3.1 70B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

22%vs42%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

38%vs52%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

65%vs79.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1245ptsvs1330pts
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

160 tok/s vs75 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Llama 3.1 8B0.22s
Llama 3.1 70B0.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Llama 3.1 8B3.35s
Llama 3.1 70B7.07s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Llama 3.1 8B Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Llama 3.1 70B Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Llama 3.1 8B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 22% · GPQA Diamond 38%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 160 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 220 ms
  • Pesos abertos (8B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Llama 3.1 70B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 42% · GPQA Diamond 52%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 75 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 400 ms
  • Pesos abertos (70B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricLlama 3.1 8BLlama 3.1 70B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
4K6K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureLlama 3.1 8BLlama 3.1 70B
Official API Model ID (SDK)meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8Bmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2024-072024-07
Knowledge CutoffDecember 2023December 2023
ArchitectureDense auto-regressive multilingual transformerHigh-capacity dense multilingual transformer
Parameters8B70B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Llama 3.1 8B vs Llama 3.1 70B: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Llama 3.1 8B or Llama 3.1 70B?

Llama 3.1 70B is more intelligent. It scores 75 compared with 60 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama 3.1 8B is faster, generating 160 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 3.1 8B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.22s compared with 0.40s.

Veredito

Tanto Llama 3.1 8B (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Llama 3.1 70B (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Llama 3.1 70B lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Llama 3.1 8B oferece geração mais rápida e Llama 3.1 8B apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Llama 3.1 8B ou Llama 3.1 70B?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Llama 3.1 70B leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Llama 3.1 8B ou Llama 3.1 70B?+

O Llama 3.1 8B custa $0.00 / $0.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Llama 3.1 70B custa $0.00 / $0.00. No custo combinado, Llama 3.1 8B é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Llama 3.1 8B suporta 128K tokens de contexto contra 128K tokens do Llama 3.1 70B, enquanto Llama 3.1 8B entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Meta e Meta e benchmarks independentes (2026).