Grok Build 0.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Grok Build 0.1 by xAI against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Grok Build 0.1
Modelo de Raciocínio ProfundoO Grok Build 0.1 da xAI é um modelo de inteligência artificial com janela de contexto de 256K tokens e preço de API de $1.0/1M na entrada e $2.0/1M na saída, projetado para programação, raciocínio e automação empresarial.
$1.00 / 1M
$2.00 / 1M
256K tokens
69.8%
Gemini 4 Argon
Modelo de Raciocínio ProfundoO Gemini 4 Argon da Google é um modelo de inteligência artificial com janela de contexto de 1M tokens e preço de API de $2/1M na entrada e $10/1M na saída, projetado para programação, raciocínio e automação empresarial.
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
81.9%
Principais Diferenças em Resumo
- Grok Build 0.1 is 3.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 256K tokens).
- Grok Build 0.1 is faster at 120 tok/s vs 115 tok/s.
- Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 69.8%).
| Feature | Grok Build 0.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 65 | 97 |
Provider | xAI | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.00 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $2.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.57 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 66K | 1000K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 120 tok/s | 115 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 69.8% | 81.9% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 68.2% | 81.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.25 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Quem vence em cada categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latência e Tempo de Resposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Grok Build 0.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arquitetura Code-Specialized Autoregressive Transformer avançada da xAI com contexto de 256K tokens
- Excelente relação custo-benefício ($1.0/1M entrada, $2.0/1M saída) e baixa latência
- Forte desempenho em benchmarks de código, análise lógica e tarefas multilíngues
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Cargas de trabalho com contexto máximo exigem monitoramento de custos de tokens
- Requer engenharia de prompt adequada para fluxos de trabalho altamente específicos
Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arquitetura Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts avançada da Google com contexto de 1M tokens
- Excelente relação custo-benefício ($2/1M entrada, $10/1M saída) e baixa latência
- Forte desempenho em benchmarks de código, análise lógica e tarefas multilíngues
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Cargas de trabalho com contexto máximo exigem monitoramento de custos de tokens
- Requer engenharia de prompt adequada para fluxos de trabalho altamente específicos
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Grok Build 0.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.95 | $2.45 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 42K | 75K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 18K | 36K |
Especificações Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Grok Build 0.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | grok-build-0-1-latest | models/gemini-4-argon |
| API Protocol | xAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | January 2026 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Code-Specialized Autoregressive Transformer | Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($1/1M in) across full 256K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.25/1M tokens | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Real-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code Execution | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | xAI Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Grok Build 0.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Grok Build 0.1 or Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 65 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Grok Build 0.1 is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 115 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $0.57 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Grok Build 0.1 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.55s compared with 0.85s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 256K tokens.
Veredito
Choose Grok Build 0.1 for automação corporativa, engenharia de software, agentes autônomos e pipelines de produção com xai, or choose Gemini 4 Argon for automação corporativa, engenharia de software, agentes autônomos e pipelines de produção com google.
Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Grok Build 0.1 or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Grok Build 0.1 costs $1/1M input and $2/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Grok Build 0.1 or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fontes oficiais: xAI & Google Official Documentation