Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (4)
OpenAIMoonshot AIflagshipflagship

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI against Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O GPT-6.1 Sol da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 120 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 94/100 e tar

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.3%

Moonshot AI

Kimi K3

Raciocínio de Pesos Abertos

O Kimi K3 da Moonshot AI é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio em cadeia de pensamento com pesos abertos e alta eficiência, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1.0M, velocidade de 58 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 93/100 e tarifa de

Intelligence Index93 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.5%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Kimi K3 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Kimi K3 has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
  • GPT-6.1 Sol is faster at 120 tok/s vs 58 tok/s.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 74.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-6.1 SolKimi K3
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9493
Provider
OpenAIMoonshot AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.47 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K131K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
120 tok/s58 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
82.3%74.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
80.8%79%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-6.1 Sol
+7.8% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Kimi K3
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-6.1 Sol
+107% faster generation
Context
Kimi K3
1.05M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-6.1 SolKimi K3
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

82.3%vs74.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

80.8%vs79%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

89.9%vs88.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1519ptsvs1480pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

18.1%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

63.6%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

54.8%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

79.7%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

93.5%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

91%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

120 tok/s vs58 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-6.1 Sol1.12s
Kimi K30.72s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-6.1 Sol5.29s
Kimi K39.34s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-6.1 Sol Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Kimi K3 Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Kimi K3 saves approximately $12.15 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 82.3% · GPQA Diamond 80.8%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 120 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1120 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Kimi K3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1.0M com limite máximo de saída de 131K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 74.5% · GPQA Diamond 79%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 58 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 720 ms
  • Pesos abertos (2.8T total (MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolKimi K3
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.05$2.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
62K35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
36K18K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-6.1 SolKimi K3
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-6-1-solkimi-k3
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092026-07
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026March 2026
ArchitectureNear-Astra unified reasoning modelColossus-Scale Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidential2.8T total (MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K windowFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1736 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 6020 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-6.1 Sol or Kimi K3?

GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 93 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6.1 Sol is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 58 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Kimi K3 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Kimi K3 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.72s compared with 1.12s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Kimi K3 has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Veredito

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api., or choose Kimi K3 for indicado para raciocínio em cadeia de pensamento com pesos abertos e alta eficiência, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api..

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: GPT-6.1 Sol or Kimi K3?+

GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while Kimi K3 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: GPT-6.1 Sol or Kimi K3?+

GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens whereas Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: OpenAI & Moonshot AI Official Documentation