Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-5 mini da OpenAI e GPT-5 nano da OpenAI são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O GPT-5 mini oferece uma janela de contexto de 400K tokens a $0.25/$2.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o GPT-5 nano oferece 400K tokens de contexto a $0.05/$0.40 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5 mini

Modelo Leve e Econômico

O GPT-5 mini da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 400K, velocidade de 185 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 46/100 e tarifa de $0.25

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

52%

OpenAI

GPT-5 nano

Modelo Leve e Econômico

O GPT-5 nano da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 400K, velocidade de 250 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 35/100 e tarifa de $0.05

Intelligence Index35 / 100
Input Token:

$0.05 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

34.5%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • GPT-5 nano is 5.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-5 nano is faster at 250 tok/s vs 185 tok/s.
  • GPT-5 mini leads on SWE-bench coding (52.0% vs 34.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-5 miniGPT-5 nano
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4635
Provider
OpenAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.05 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.40 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.27 / 1M$0.05 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
185 tok/s250 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
52%34.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
66%48%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.03 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-5 mini
+17.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-5 nano
5.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-5 nano
+35% faster generation
Context
Tied
400K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5 miniGPT-5 nano
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

52%vs34.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

66%vs48%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

78.5%vs66.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1315ptsvs1250pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

9.2%vs6%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

30.5%vs18.5%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

32%vs22%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

56.5%vs37.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

84%vs62%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

68.5%vs57%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

185 tok/s vs250 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5 mini0.70s
GPT-5 nano0.38s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5 mini3.40s
GPT-5 nano2.38s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5 mini Monthly API Bill
$2.21 / month
$0.25/1M in · $2/1M out
GPT-5 nano Monthly API Bill
$0.44 / month
$0.05/1M in · $0.4/1M out
GPT-5 nano saves approximately $1.77 / month (80%) under this workload.5.0x Savings

GPT-5 mini · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 400K com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 52% · GPQA Diamond 66%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 185 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 700 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.25/$2 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

GPT-5 nano · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 400K com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 34.5% · GPQA Diamond 48%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 250 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 380 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.05/$0.4 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5 miniGPT-5 nano
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.32$0.06
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
50K42K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
24K18K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-5 miniGPT-5 nano
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-minigpt-5-nano
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2025-082025-08
Knowledge CutoffSeptember 2024September 2024
ArchitectureCompact unified reasoning modelNano unified reasoning model
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.25/1M in) across full 400K windowFlat rate ($0.05/1M in) across full 400K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.025/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $0.005/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5 nano: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5 mini or GPT-5 nano?

GPT-5 mini is more intelligent. It scores 46 compared with 35 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5 nano is faster, generating 250 tokens per second compared with 185 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-5 nano is cheaper at $0.05 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.27 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-5 nano has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 0.70s.

Veredito

Tanto GPT-5 mini (Indicado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto GPT-5 nano (Indicado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: GPT-5 mini lidera em inteligência geral e programação, GPT-5 nano oferece geração mais rápida e GPT-5 nano apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, GPT-5 mini ou GPT-5 nano?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, GPT-5 mini leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, GPT-5 mini ou GPT-5 nano?+

O GPT-5 mini custa $0.25 / $2.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o GPT-5 nano custa $0.05 / $0.40. No custo combinado, GPT-5 nano é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O GPT-5 mini suporta 400K tokens de contexto contra 400K tokens do GPT-5 nano, enquanto GPT-5 nano entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da OpenAI e OpenAI e benchmarks independentes (2026).