Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna da OpenAI e Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite da Google são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O GPT-5.6 Luna oferece uma janela de contexto de 1.05M tokens a $0.20/$1.20 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite oferece 1.05M tokens de contexto a $0.40/$2.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

Modelo Leve e Econômico

O GPT-5.6 Luna da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1.1M, velocidade de 230 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 57/100 e tarifa de $0.

Intelligence Index57 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

63.5%

Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Inferência Ultrarrápida

O Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para respostas em tempo real com latência ultrabaixa e roteamento de alto volume, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1.0M, velocidade de 240 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 69/

Intelligence Index69 / 100
Input Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • GPT-5.6 Luna is 1.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-5.6 Luna has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is faster at 240 tok/s vs 230 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5769
Provider
OpenAIGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.20 / 1M$0.40 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$1.20 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.17 / 1M$0.35 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,575 A4 pages of text1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K33K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
230 tok/s240 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
63.5%N/A
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
70.5%N/A
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
GPT-5.6 Luna
1.8x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
+4% faster generation
Context
GPT-5.6 Luna
1.05M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

63.5%vsN/A
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

70.5%vsN/A
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

83.5%vs81.2%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1368ptsvs1375pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

11.4%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

38.5%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

36%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

62.5%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

87%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

76.5%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

230 tok/s vs240 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5.6 Luna0.42s
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite0.29s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5.6 Luna2.59s
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite2.37s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5.6 Luna Monthly API Bill
$1.41 / month
$0.2/1M in · $1.2/1M out
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Monthly API Bill
$2.55 / month
$0.4/1M in · $2/1M out
GPT-5.6 Luna saves approximately $1.14 / month (45%) under this workload.1.8x Savings

GPT-5.6 Luna · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1.1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 63.5% · GPQA Diamond 70.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 230 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 420 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.2/$1.2 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1.0M com limite máximo de saída de 33K tokens (MMLU-Pro 81.2% · Arena Elo 1375)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 240 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 290 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.4/$2 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.19$0.55
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
46K18K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
20K7K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-6-lunamodels/gemini-3-5-flash-lite
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2026-072026-07
Knowledge CutoffFebruary 2026March 2026
ArchitectureEfficient compact reasoning modelLightweight efficient multimodal transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 1050K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.02/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.6 Luna or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is more intelligent. It scores 69 compared with 57 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is faster, generating 240 tokens per second compared with 230 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper at $0.17 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.35 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.29s compared with 0.42s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Luna has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1.05M tokens.

Veredito

Tanto GPT-5.6 Luna (Indicado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Indicado para respostas em tempo real com latência ultrabaixa e roteamento de alto volume, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite oferece geração mais rápida e GPT-5.6 Luna apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, GPT-5.6 Luna ou Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, GPT-5.6 Luna ou Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?+

O GPT-5.6 Luna custa $0.20 / $1.20 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite custa $0.40 / $2.00. No custo combinado, GPT-5.6 Luna é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O GPT-5.6 Luna suporta 1.05M tokens de contexto contra 1.05M tokens do Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, enquanto Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da OpenAI e Google e benchmarks independentes (2026).