Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Llama 5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (4)
OpenAIMetalightweightopen-source

Compare GPT-5.1 Codex mini by OpenAI against Llama 5 by Meta across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex mini

Modelo Leve e Econômico

O GPT-5.1 Codex mini da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 400K, velocidade de 180 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 47/100 e tarifa

Intelligence Index47 / 100
Input Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

55.5%

Meta

Llama 5

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Llama 5 da Meta é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 5M, velocidade de 65 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 94/100 e tarifa de ace

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

5M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Llama 5 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 400K tokens).
  • GPT-5.1 Codex mini is faster at 180 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
  • Llama 5 leads on SWE-bench coding (74.0% vs 55.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-5.1 Codex miniLlama 5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4794
Provider
OpenAIMeta
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.27 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
180 tok/s65 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
55.5%74%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
66.5%84%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.03 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Llama 5
+18.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Llama 5
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-5.1 Codex mini
+177% faster generation
Context
Llama 5
5M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.1 Codex miniLlama 5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

55.5%vs74%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

66.5%vs84%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

79%vs87%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1320ptsvs1485pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

9.4%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

32%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

33%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

58%vs68%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

84.5%vs88%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

69%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

180 tok/s vs65 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5.1 Codex mini0.72s
Llama 50.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5.1 Codex mini3.50s
Llama 58.54s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5.1 Codex mini Monthly API Bill
$2.21 / month
$0.25/1M in · $2/1M out
Llama 5 Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Llama 5 saves approximately $2.21 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GPT-5.1 Codex mini · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 400K com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 55.5% · GPQA Diamond 66.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 180 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 720 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.25/$2 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 5M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 74% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 65 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 850 ms
  • Pesos abertos (600B+ total (~40-80B )) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5.1 Codex miniLlama 5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.33$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
48K40K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
23K20K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-5.1 Codex miniLlama 5
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-1-codex-minimeta-llama/Llama-5
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-112026-04
Knowledge CutoffOctober 2024January 2026
ArchitectureCompact code-specialised reasoning modelMixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active)
ParametersConfidential600B+ total (~40-80B active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.25/1M in) across full 400K windowFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.025/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision, video, audio
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Llama 5: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.1 Codex mini or Llama 5?

Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 47 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini is faster, generating 180 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 5 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.27 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.72s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 400K tokens.

Veredito

Choose GPT-5.1 Codex mini for indicado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api., or choose Llama 5 for indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api..

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: GPT-5.1 Codex mini or Llama 5?+

GPT-5.1 Codex mini costs $0.25/1M input and $2/1M output tokens, while Llama 5 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: GPT-5.1 Codex mini or Llama 5?+

GPT-5.1 Codex mini supports 400K tokens whereas Llama 5 supports 5M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: OpenAI & Meta Official Documentation