Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemma 3 vs Llama 4 Scout

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial

Partilhar

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Gemma 3Profile

Llama 4 ScoutProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Google

Gemma 3

IA Multimodal Nativa

O Gemma 3 da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 131K, velocidade de 105 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 68/100 e tarif

Intelligence Index68 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Llama 4 Scout

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Llama 4 Scout da Meta é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 3.5M, velocidade de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 76/100 e tarif

Intelligence Index76 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

3.5M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
Llama 4 Scout has a larger context window (4M vs 131K tokens).
Gemma 3 is faster at 105 tok/s vs 95 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Gemma 3	Llama 4 Scout
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	68	76
Provider	Google	Meta
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text	3.5M tokens~5,250 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	16K	33K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	105 tok/s	95 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	N/A	N/A
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	61%	N/A

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

Tied

Identical monthly runtime cost

Speed

Gemma 3

+11% faster generation

Context

Llama 4 Scout

3.5M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemma 3Llama 4 Scout

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

61%vsN/A

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

78%vs78%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1335ptsvs1370pts

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs92.5%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

105 tok/s vs95 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Gemma 30.32s

Llama 4 Scout0.65s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Gemma 35.08s

Llama 4 Scout5.91s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Gemma 3 Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Llama 4 Scout Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Gemma 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 131K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (GPQA Diamond 61% · MMLU-Pro 78%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 105 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 320 ms
Pesos abertos (1B / 4B / 12B / 27B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Llama 4 Scout · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 3.5M com limite máximo de saída de 33K tokens (MMLU-Pro 78% · Arena Elo 1370)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 95 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 650 ms
Pesos abertos (17B (109B total MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Gemma 3	Llama 4 Scout
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$0.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	5K	10K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	0K	0K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Gemma 3	Llama 4 Scout
Official API Model ID (SDK)	models/gemma-3	meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout
API Protocol	Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2025-03	2025-04
Knowledge Cutoff	December 2024	January 2025
Architecture	Native multimodal open transformer with expanded context	Extreme-context sparse MoE multimodal transformer (17B active / 109B total)
Parameters	1B / 4B / 12B / 27B	17B (109B total MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 11 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 37 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Gemma 3 vs Llama 4 Scout: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemma 3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is more intelligent. It scores 76 compared with 68 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemma 3 is faster, generating 105 tokens per second compared with 95 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Gemma 3 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.32s compared with 0.65s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama 4 Scout has a larger context window, supporting 3.5M tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Gemma 3 (Indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Llama 4 Scout (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Llama 4 Scout lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Gemma 3 oferece geração mais rápida e Gemma 3 apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Gemma 3 ou Llama 4 Scout?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Llama 4 Scout leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Gemma 3 ou Llama 4 Scout?+

O Gemma 3 custa $0.00 / $0.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Llama 4 Scout custa $0.00 / $0.00. No custo combinado, Gemma 3 é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Gemma 3 suporta 131.1K tokens de contexto contra 3.5M tokens do Llama 4 Scout, enquanto Gemma 3 entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Gemma 3 vs Llama 4 Scout

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Gemma 3

Llama 4 Scout

Quem vence em cada categoria?

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Gemma 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Llama 4 Scout · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Especificações Técnicas

Gemma 3 vs Llama 4 Scout: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Veredito

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Related reading