Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (4)
GoogleAlibabaflagshipflagship

Compare Gemini 4 Argon by Google against Qwen3.8 Max Preview by Alibaba across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 4 Argon

IA Multimodal Nativa

O Gemini 4 Argon da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 115 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 97/100 e

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Alibaba

Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Qwen3.8 Max Preview da Alibaba é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 60 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 93/100

Intelligence Index93 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

75.2%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 60 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 75.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.8 Max Preview
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9793
Provider
GoogleAlibaba
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.47 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
1000K32K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
115 tok/s60 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
81.9%75.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
81.5%79.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+6.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+92% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.8 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

81.9%vs75.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

81.5%vs79.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

90.8%vs89%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1525ptsvs1485pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

18.9%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

57.4%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

56.4%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

80.5%vs77%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

94.8%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

96.4%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

115 tok/s vs60 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview0.68s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview9.01s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview saves approximately $12.15 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 1M tokens (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 115 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 850 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Qwen3.8 Max Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 32K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 75.2% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 60 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 680 ms
  • Pesos abertos (2.4T total (95B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.8 Max Preview
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.45$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
75K35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
36K15K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.8 Max Preview
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-4-argonqwen3-8-max-preview-instruct
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092026-07
Knowledge CutoffJune 2026April 2026
ArchitecturePathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-ExpertsColossus-Scale Open Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidential2.4T total (95B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1488 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 5160 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 93 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 60 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.68s compared with 0.85s.

Veredito

Choose Gemini 4 Argon for indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api., or choose Qwen3.8 Max Preview for indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api..

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while Qwen3.8 Max Preview costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens whereas Qwen3.8 Max Preview supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Google & Alibaba Official Documentation