Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash da Google e Gemini 3 Pro da Google são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Gemini 3 Flash oferece uma janela de contexto de 1.05M tokens a $0.50/$3.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Gemini 3 Pro oferece 2M tokens de contexto a $2.00/$12.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 3 Flash

Inferência Ultrarrápida

O Gemini 3 Flash da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para respostas em tempo real com latência ultrabaixa e roteamento de alto volume, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1.0M, velocidade de 180 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 75/100 e t

Intelligence Index75 / 100
Input Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

66.5%

Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Gemini 3 Pro da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 2M, velocidade de 118 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 62/100 e ta

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$12.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.2%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Gemini 3 Flash is 3.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 3 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 3 Flash is faster at 180 tok/s vs 118 tok/s.
  • Gemini 3 Pro leads on SWE-bench coding (76.2% vs 66.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Pro
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7562
Provider
GoogleGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.50 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$3.00 / 1M$12.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.49 / 1M$1.74 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K66K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
180 tok/s118 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
66.5%76.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
79%73.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.13 / 1M$0.20 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 3 Pro
+9.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 3 Flash
3.9x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 3 Flash
+53% faster generation
Context
Gemini 3 Pro
2M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Pro
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

66.5%vs76.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

79%vs73.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

85.8%vs86.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1425ptsvs1384pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs12.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs47.9%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs44.8%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

88%vs92.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs84.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

180 tok/s vs118 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 3 Flash0.40s
Gemini 3 Pro1.80s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 3 Flash3.18s
Gemini 3 Pro6.04s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 3 Flash Monthly API Bill
$3.64 / month
$0.5/1M in · $3/1M out
Gemini 3 Pro Monthly API Bill
$14.10 / month
$2/1M in · $12/1M out
Gemini 3 Flash saves approximately $10.46 / month (74%) under this workload.3.9x Savings

Gemini 3 Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1.0M com limite máximo de saída de 66K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 66.5% · GPQA Diamond 79%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 180 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 400 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.5/$3 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Gemini 3 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 2M com limite máximo de saída de 66K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 76.2% · GPQA Diamond 73.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 118 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1800 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($2/$12 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Pro
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.95$2.40
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
35K60K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
16K31K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Pro
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-3-flashmodels/gemini-3-pro
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2025-122025-11
Knowledge CutoffSeptember 2025January 2025
ArchitectureNext-gen sparse multimodal mixture-of-expertsSparse Multimodal MoE
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.125/1M with configurable TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.2/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3 Pro?

Gemini 3 Flash is more intelligent. It scores 75 compared with 62 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 3 Flash is faster, generating 180 tokens per second compared with 118 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper at $0.49 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.74 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 3 Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.40s compared with 1.80s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 3 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 1.05M tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Gemini 3 Flash (Indicado para respostas em tempo real com latência ultrabaixa e roteamento de alto volume, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Gemini 3 Pro (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Gemini 3 Flash lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Gemini 3 Flash oferece geração mais rápida e Gemini 3 Flash apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Gemini 3 Flash ou Gemini 3 Pro?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Gemini 3 Flash leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Gemini 3 Flash ou Gemini 3 Pro?+

O Gemini 3 Flash custa $0.50 / $3.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Gemini 3 Pro custa $2.00 / $12.00. No custo combinado, Gemini 3 Flash é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Gemini 3 Flash suporta 1.05M tokens de contexto contra 2M tokens do Gemini 3 Pro, enquanto Gemini 3 Flash entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Google e Google e benchmarks independentes (2026).