Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3 Pro

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 da Anthropic e Gemini 3 Pro da Google são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Claude Fable 5.1 oferece uma janela de contexto de 1M tokens a $10.00/$50.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Gemini 3 Pro oferece 2M tokens de contexto a $2.00/$12.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Claude Fable 5.1 da Anthropic é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 65 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 82/10

Intelligence Index82 / 100
Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$50.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

83.8%

Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Gemini 3 Pro da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 2M, velocidade de 118 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 62/100 e ta

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$12.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.2%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Gemini 3 Pro is 4.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 3 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 3 Pro is faster at 118 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 leads on SWE-bench coding (83.8% vs 76.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3 Pro
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8262
Provider
AnthropicGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$10.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$50.00 / 1M$12.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$7.17 / 1M$1.74 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K66K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
65 tok/s118 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
83.8%76.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
81.6%73.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.20 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Fable 5.1
+7.6% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 3 Pro
4.3x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro
+82% faster generation
Context
Gemini 3 Pro
2M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Claude Fable 5.1Gemini 3 Pro
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

83.8%vs76.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

81.6%vs73.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

91%vs86.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1510ptsvs1384pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs12.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

62%vs47.9%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs44.8%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs92.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs84.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs118 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Claude Fable 5.11.45s
Gemini 3 Pro1.80s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Claude Fable 5.19.14s
Gemini 3 Pro6.04s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Claude Fable 5.1 Monthly API Bill
$60.38 / month
$10/1M in · $50/1M out
Gemini 3 Pro Monthly API Bill
$14.10 / month
$2/1M in · $12/1M out
Gemini 3 Pro saves approximately $46.27 / month (77%) under this workload.4.3x Savings

Claude Fable 5.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 83.8% · GPQA Diamond 81.6%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 65 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1450 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($10/$50 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Gemini 3 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 2M com limite máximo de saída de 66K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 76.2% · GPQA Diamond 73.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 118 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1800 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($2/$12 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3 Pro
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$10.97$2.40
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
72K60K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
37K31K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3 Pro
Official API Model ID (SDK)claude-fable-5-1-20260901models/gemini-3-pro
API ProtocolAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2026-092025-11
Knowledge CutoffJune 2026January 2025
ArchitectureFrontier Auditable Multimodal TransformerSparse Multimodal MoE
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL$0.25/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.2/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP ConnectorsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety EvaluatedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3 Pro: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 3 Pro?

Claude Fable 5.1 is more intelligent. It scores 82 compared with 62 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 3 Pro is faster, generating 118 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 3 Pro is cheaper at $1.74 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.17 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude Fable 5.1 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.45s compared with 1.80s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 3 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Claude Fable 5.1 (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Gemini 3 Pro (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Claude Fable 5.1 lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Gemini 3 Pro oferece geração mais rápida e Gemini 3 Pro apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Claude Fable 5.1 ou Gemini 3 Pro?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Claude Fable 5.1 leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Claude Fable 5.1 ou Gemini 3 Pro?+

O Claude Fable 5.1 custa $10.00 / $50.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Gemini 3 Pro custa $2.00 / $12.00. No custo combinado, Gemini 3 Pro é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Claude Fable 5.1 suporta 1M tokens de contexto contra 2M tokens do Gemini 3 Pro, enquanto Gemini 3 Pro entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Anthropic e Google e benchmarks independentes (2026).