Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro da Google e Gemini 2.0 Pro da Google são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Gemini 2.5 Pro oferece uma janela de contexto de 1.05M tokens a $1.25/$10.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Gemini 2.0 Pro oferece 2M tokens de contexto a $1.25/$5.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Motor de Raciocínio Profundo

O Gemini 2.5 Pro da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1.0M, velocidade de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 78/1

Intelligence Index78 / 100
Input Token:

$1.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

63.8%

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Gemini 2.0 Pro da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 2M, velocidade de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 52/100 e t

Intelligence Index52 / 100
Input Token:

$1.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

63.8%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Gemini 2.0 Pro is 1.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 2.0 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 2.0 Pro is faster at 95 tok/s vs 95 tok/s.
  • Gemini 2.0 Pro leads on SWE-bench coding (63.8% vs 63.8%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Pro
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7852
Provider
GoogleGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.25 / 1M$1.25 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$5.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.47 / 1M$0.97 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
95 tok/s95 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
63.8%63.8%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
84%71.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.31 / 1M$0.31 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 2.0 Pro
+0.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 2.0 Pro
1.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 2.0 Pro
+0% faster generation
Context
Gemini 2.0 Pro
2M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Pro
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

63.8%vs63.8%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

84%vs71.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.5%vs79.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1420ptsvs1330pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs11.4%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs42.1%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs38.3%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs65.6%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

92%vs82.2%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs71.8%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

95 tok/s vs95 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro0.82s
Gemini 2.0 Pro0.62s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 2.5 Pro6.08s
Gemini 2.0 Pro5.88s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 2.5 Pro Monthly API Bill
$11.34 / month
$1.25/1M in · $10/1M out
Gemini 2.0 Pro Monthly API Bill
$6.84 / month
$1.25/1M in · $5/1M out
Gemini 2.0 Pro saves approximately $4.50 / month (40%) under this workload.1.7x Savings

Gemini 2.5 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1.0M com limite máximo de saída de 66K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 63.8% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 95 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 820 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($1.25/$10 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Gemini 2.0 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 2M com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 63.8% · GPQA Diamond 71.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 95 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 620 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($1.25/$5 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Pro
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$1.45$1.59
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
45K60K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
22K33K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Pro
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-2-5-promodels/gemini-2-pro
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2025-032025-02
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2025January 2025
ArchitecturePathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts with ThinkingMultimodal Deep Reasoning Sparse MoE
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.31/1M with configurable TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.31/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Pro: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is more intelligent. It scores 78 compared with 52 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.97 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 2.0 Pro has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.62s compared with 0.82s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 2.0 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 1.05M tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Gemini 2.5 Pro (Indicado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Gemini 2.0 Pro (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Gemini 2.5 Pro lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Gemini 2.5 Pro oferece geração mais rápida e Gemini 2.0 Pro apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Gemini 2.5 Pro ou Gemini 2.0 Pro?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Gemini 2.5 Pro leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Gemini 2.5 Pro ou Gemini 2.0 Pro?+

O Gemini 2.5 Pro custa $1.25 / $10.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Gemini 2.0 Pro custa $1.25 / $5.00. No custo combinado, Gemini 2.0 Pro é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Gemini 2.5 Pro suporta 1.05M tokens de contexto contra 2M tokens do Gemini 2.0 Pro, enquanto Gemini 2.5 Pro entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Google e Google e benchmarks independentes (2026).