Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (4)
GoogleGoogleflagshipflagship

Compare Gemini 1.5 Pro by Google against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Modelo de Geração Clássica

O Gemini 1.5 Pro da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para assistentes conversacionais, síntese de textos e tarefas corporativas, oferecendo janela de contexto de 2M, velocidade de 65 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 46/100 e tarifa de

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$1.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

32.5%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

IA Multimodal Nativa

O Gemini 4 Argon da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 115 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 97/100 e

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Gemini 1.5 Pro is 1.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 32.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 1.5 ProGemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4697
Provider
GoogleGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.25 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$5.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.97 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
65 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
32.5%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
58.5%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.31 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+49.4% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1.8x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+77% faster generation
Context
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 1.5 ProGemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

32.5%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

58.5%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75.2%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1290ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

89.2%vs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs115 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 1.5 Pro0.80s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 1.5 Pro8.49s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 1.5 Pro Monthly API Bill
$6.84 / month
$1.25/1M in · $5/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Gemini 1.5 Pro saves approximately $5.31 / month (44%) under this workload.1.8x Savings

Gemini 1.5 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 2M com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 32.5% · GPQA Diamond 58.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 65 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 800 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($1.25/$5 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 1M tokens (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 115 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 850 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 1.5 ProGemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.20$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
24K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K36K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 1.5 ProGemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-1-5-promodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2024-022026-09
Knowledge CutoffMay 2024June 2026
ArchitectureSparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) MultimodalPathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.31/1M with configurable TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 1.5 Pro or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 1.5 Pro is cheaper at $0.97 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 1.5 Pro has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.80s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 1.5 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Veredito

Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro for indicado para assistentes conversacionais, síntese de textos e tarefas corporativas, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api., or choose Gemini 4 Argon for indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api..

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Gemini 1.5 Pro costs $1.25/1M input and $5/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Gemini 1.5 Pro supports 2M tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Google & Google Official Documentation