Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3 Opus

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3 Opus: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Pro da Google e Claude 3 Opus da Anthropic são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Gemini 1.5 Pro oferece uma janela de contexto de 2M tokens a $1.25/$5.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Claude 3 Opus oferece 200K tokens de contexto a $15.00/$75.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Modelo de Geração Clássica

O Gemini 1.5 Pro da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para assistentes conversacionais, síntese de textos e tarefas corporativas, oferecendo janela de contexto de 2M, velocidade de 65 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 46/100 e tarifa de

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$1.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

32.5%

Anthropic

Claude 3 Opus

Modelo de Geração Clássica

O Claude 3 Opus da Anthropic é um modelo de IA projetado para assistentes conversacionais, síntese de textos e tarefas corporativas, oferecendo janela de contexto de 200K, velocidade de 30 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 44/100 e tarifa

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$75.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

32.2%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Gemini 1.5 Pro is 13.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 200K tokens).
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro is faster at 65 tok/s vs 30 tok/s.
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro leads on SWE-bench coding (32.5% vs 32.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 1.5 ProClaude 3 Opus
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4644
Provider
GoogleAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.25 / 1M$15.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$5.00 / 1M$75.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.97 / 1M$11.55 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
65 tok/s30 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
32.5%32.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
58.5%50.4%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.31 / 1M$1.50 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 1.5 Pro
+0.3% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 1.5 Pro
13.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 1.5 Pro
+117% faster generation
Context
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 1.5 ProClaude 3 Opus
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

32.5%vs32.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

58.5%vs50.4%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75.2%vs74%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1290ptsvs1262pts
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

89.2%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs30 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 1.5 Pro0.80s
Claude 3 Opus1.20s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 1.5 Pro8.49s
Claude 3 Opus17.87s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 1.5 Pro Monthly API Bill
$6.84 / month
$1.25/1M in · $5/1M out
Claude 3 Opus Monthly API Bill
$92.25 / month
$15/1M in · $75/1M out
Gemini 1.5 Pro saves approximately $85.41 / month (93%) under this workload.13.5x Savings

Gemini 1.5 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 2M com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 32.5% · GPQA Diamond 58.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 65 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 800 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($1.25/$5 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Claude 3 Opus · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 200K com limite máximo de saída de 4K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 32.2% · GPQA Diamond 50.4%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 30 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1200 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($15/$75 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 1.5 ProClaude 3 Opus
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.20$0.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
24K24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 1.5 ProClaude 3 Opus
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-1-5-proclaude-3-opus-20240301
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2024-022024-03
Knowledge CutoffMay 2024August 2023
ArchitectureSparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) MultimodalFrontier Dense Multimodal Transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.31/1M with configurable TTL$1.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3 Opus: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 1.5 Pro or Claude 3 Opus?

Gemini 1.5 Pro is more intelligent. It scores 46 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 1.5 Pro is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 30 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 1.5 Pro is cheaper at $0.97 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $11.55 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 1.5 Pro has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.80s compared with 1.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 1.5 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 200K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Gemini 1.5 Pro (Indicado para assistentes conversacionais, síntese de textos e tarefas corporativas, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Claude 3 Opus (Indicado para assistentes conversacionais, síntese de textos e tarefas corporativas, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Gemini 1.5 Pro lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Gemini 1.5 Pro oferece geração mais rápida e Gemini 1.5 Pro apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Gemini 1.5 Pro ou Claude 3 Opus?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Gemini 1.5 Pro leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Gemini 1.5 Pro ou Claude 3 Opus?+

O Gemini 1.5 Pro custa $1.25 / $5.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Claude 3 Opus custa $15.00 / $75.00. No custo combinado, Gemini 1.5 Pro é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Gemini 1.5 Pro suporta 2M tokens de contexto contra 200K tokens do Claude 3 Opus, enquanto Gemini 1.5 Pro entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Google e Anthropic e benchmarks independentes (2026).