Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Devstral Small vs Codestral

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Devstral Small vs Codestral: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Devstral Small da Mistral AI e Codestral da Mistral AI são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Devstral Small oferece uma janela de contexto de 128K tokens a $0.15/$0.45 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Codestral oferece 256K tokens de contexto a $0.20/$0.60 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Devstral Small

IA Agêntica e Uso de Ferramentas

O Devstral Small da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 45/100 e

Intelligence Index45 / 100
Input Token:

$0.15 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.45 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

42%

Mistral AI

Codestral

Especialista Aberto em Código

O Codestral da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para desenvolvimento de software e geração de código com pesos abertos auto-hospedáveis, oferecendo janela de contexto de 256K, velocidade de 110 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 40/1

Intelligence Index40 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

28%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Devstral Small is 1.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Codestral has a larger context window (256K vs 128K tokens).
  • Codestral is faster at 110 tok/s vs 95 tok/s.
  • Devstral Small leads on SWE-bench coding (42.0% vs 28.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureDevstral SmallCodestral
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4540
Provider
Mistral AIMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.15 / 1M$0.20 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.45 / 1M$0.60 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.11 / 1M$0.14 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
95 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
42%28%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
50%42%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.05 / 1M$0.05 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Devstral Small
+14.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Devstral Small
1.3x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Codestral
+16% faster generation
Context
Codestral
256K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Devstral SmallCodestral
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

42%vs28%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

50%vs42%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74%vs70%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1270ptsvs1240pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

36.5%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

60%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

70%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

95 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Devstral Small0.42s
Codestral0.35s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Devstral Small5.68s
Codestral4.90s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Devstral Small Monthly API Bill
$0.71 / month
$0.15/1M in · $0.45/1M out
Codestral Monthly API Bill
$0.92 / month
$0.2/1M in · $0.6/1M out
Devstral Small saves approximately $0.21 / month (23%) under this workload.1.3x Savings

Devstral Small · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 42% · GPQA Diamond 50%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 95 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 420 ms
  • Pesos abertos (24B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Codestral · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 256K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 28% · GPQA Diamond 42%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 110 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 350 ms
  • Pesos abertos (22B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricDevstral SmallCodestral
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.14$0.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
30K24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureDevstral SmallCodestral
Official API Model ID (SDK)devstral-small-latestcodestral-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-072024-05
Knowledge CutoffMay 2025May 2024
ArchitectureCode-Optimized Autoregressive TransformerCode-Optimized Transformer with 32K Window
Parameters24B22B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.15/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 256K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.05/1M tokensCached input at $0.05/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 15 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 52 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 14 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 47 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Devstral Small vs Codestral: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Devstral Small or Codestral?

Devstral Small is more intelligent. It scores 45 compared with 40 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Codestral is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 95 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Devstral Small is cheaper at $0.11 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.14 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Codestral has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.35s compared with 0.42s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Codestral has a larger context window, supporting 256K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Devstral Small (Indicado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Codestral (Indicado para desenvolvimento de software e geração de código com pesos abertos auto-hospedáveis, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Devstral Small lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Codestral oferece geração mais rápida e Devstral Small apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Devstral Small ou Codestral?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Devstral Small leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Devstral Small ou Codestral?+

O Devstral Small custa $0.15 / $0.45 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Codestral custa $0.20 / $0.60. No custo combinado, Devstral Small é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Devstral Small suporta 128K tokens de contexto contra 256K tokens do Codestral, enquanto Codestral entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Mistral AI e Mistral AI e benchmarks independentes (2026).