Head-to-Head Model Comparison

DeepSeek V3 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (4)
DeepSeekGoogleflagshipflagship

Compare DeepSeek V3 by DeepSeek against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O DeepSeek V3 da DeepSeek é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 60 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 44/100 e tar

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$0.27 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.10 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

49.2%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

IA Multimodal Nativa

O Gemini 4 Argon da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 115 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 97/100 e

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • DeepSeek V3 is 8.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 128K tokens).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 60 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 49.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureDeepSeek V3Gemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4497
Provider
DeepSeekGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.27 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$1.10 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.21 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
60 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
49.2%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
59.1%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.07 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+32.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
DeepSeek V3
8.1x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+92% faster generation
Context
Gemini 4 Argon
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

DeepSeek V3Gemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

49.2%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

59.1%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75.9%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1300ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

9.5%vs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

32.5%vs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

29.5%vs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

51.7%vs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

68%vs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

68.3%vs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

60 tok/s vs115 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
DeepSeek V30.68s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
DeepSeek V39.01s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
DeepSeek V3 Monthly API Bill
$1.50 / month
$0.27/1M in · $1.1/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
DeepSeek V3 saves approximately $10.65 / month (88%) under this workload.8.1x Savings

DeepSeek V3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 49.2% · GPQA Diamond 59.1%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 60 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 680 ms
  • Pesos abertos (671B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 1M tokens (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 115 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 850 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricDeepSeek V3Gemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.14$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
45K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K36K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureDeepSeek V3Gemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)deepseek-chatmodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2024-122026-09
Knowledge CutoffJuly 2024June 2026
Architecture671B Mixture-of-Experts (37B active)Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters671BConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.27/1M in) across full 128K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.07/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 416 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1443 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

DeepSeek V3 vs Gemini 4 Argon: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, DeepSeek V3 or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 60 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

DeepSeek V3 is cheaper at $0.21 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

DeepSeek V3 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.68s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Veredito

Choose DeepSeek V3 for indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api., or choose Gemini 4 Argon for indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api..

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: DeepSeek V3 or Gemini 4 Argon?+

DeepSeek V3 costs $0.27/1M input and $1.1/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: DeepSeek V3 or Gemini 4 Argon?+

DeepSeek V3 supports 128K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: DeepSeek & Google Official Documentation