DeepSeek-V3-0324 vs DeepSeek V3
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
DeepSeek-V3-0324 by DeepSeek and DeepSeek V3 by DeepSeek represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, both models offer identical input token rates. On output generation, costs are matched. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, both models provide an identical memory horizon with 128K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, DeepSeek-V3-0324 leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
DeepSeek-V3-0324
Modelo de Pesos AbertosO DeepSeek-V3-0324 da DeepSeek é um modelo de inteligência artificial com janela de contexto de 128K tokens e preço de API de $0.27/1M na entrada e $1.1/1M na saída, projetado para programação, raciocínio e automação empresarial.
$0.27 / 1M
$1.10 / 1M
128K tokens
52.4%
DeepSeek V3
Modelo de Pesos AbertosO DeepSeek V3 da DeepSeek é um modelo de inteligência artificial com janela de contexto de 128K tokens e preço de API de $0.27/1M na entrada e $1.1/1M na saída, projetado para programação, raciocínio e automação empresarial.
$0.27 / 1M
$1.10 / 1M
128K tokens
49.2%
Principais Diferenças em Resumo
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- DeepSeek-V3-0324 is faster at 65 tok/s vs 60 tok/s.
- DeepSeek-V3-0324 leads on SWE-bench coding (52.4% vs 49.2%).
| Feature | DeepSeek-V3-0324 | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 48 | 44 |
Provider | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.27 / 1M | $0.27 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $1.10 / 1M | $1.10 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.21 / 1M | $0.21 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 65 tok/s | 60 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 52.4% | 49.2% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 63.5% | 59.1% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.07 / 1M | $0.07 / 1M |
Quem vence em cada categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latência e Tempo de Resposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
DeepSeek-V3-0324 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arquitetura 671B Mixture-of-Experts (37B active) avançada da DeepSeek com contexto de 128K tokens
- Excelente relação custo-benefício ($0.27/1M entrada, $1.1/1M saída) e baixa latência
- Forte desempenho em benchmarks de código, análise lógica e tarefas multilíngues
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Cargas de trabalho com contexto máximo exigem monitoramento de custos de tokens
- Requer engenharia de prompt adequada para fluxos de trabalho altamente específicos
DeepSeek V3 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arquitetura 671B Mixture-of-Experts (37B active) avançada da DeepSeek com contexto de 128K tokens
- Excelente relação custo-benefício ($0.27/1M entrada, $1.1/1M saída) e baixa latência
- Forte desempenho em benchmarks de código, análise lógica e tarefas multilíngues
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Cargas de trabalho com contexto máximo exigem monitoramento de custos de tokens
- Requer engenharia de prompt adequada para fluxos de trabalho altamente específicos
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | DeepSeek-V3-0324 | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.18 | $0.14 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 45K | 45K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Especificações Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | DeepSeek-V3-0324 | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | deepseek-chat | deepseek-chat |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-03 | 2024-12 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | January 2025 | July 2024 |
| Architecture | 671B Mixture-of-Experts (37B active) | 671B Mixture-of-Experts (37B active) |
| Parameters | 671B (37B active MoE) | 671B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.27/1M in) across full 128K window | Flat rate ($0.27/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.07/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix caching at $0.07/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 416 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1443 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 416 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1443 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
DeepSeek-V3-0324 vs DeepSeek V3: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, DeepSeek-V3-0324 or DeepSeek V3?
DeepSeek-V3-0324 is more intelligent. It scores 48 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
DeepSeek-V3-0324 is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 60 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
DeepSeek-V3-0324 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.65s compared with 0.68s.
Veredito
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose DeepSeek-V3-0324 if your priority is Cost-sensitive production backends, self-hosted enterprise clusters, and automated batch code translation. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose DeepSeek V3 if your workflow prioritizes High-volume production APIs, budget-conscious full-stack development, and bulk document transformation. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)
How does DeepSeek-V3-0324 compare to DeepSeek V3 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Both DeepSeek-V3-0324 and DeepSeek V3 share matched API token pricing at $0.27 per 1M input tokens and $1.10 per 1M output tokens. Because their token economics are identical, your selection should be guided by benchmark latency, memory horizon, and reasoning capabilities rather than operational token fees. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: DeepSeek-V3-0324 or DeepSeek V3?+
Both DeepSeek-V3-0324 and DeepSeek V3 offer an identical context window of 128K tokens (~96k words). Both architectures provide equal capacity for large document ingestion, multi-file codebases, and extended multi-turn conversation histories.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: DeepSeek-V3-0324 or DeepSeek V3?+
DeepSeek-V3-0324 scores 52.4% on SWE-bench Verified while DeepSeek V3 scores 49.2%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, DeepSeek-V3-0324 holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between DeepSeek-V3-0324 and DeepSeek V3?+
DeepSeek-V3-0324 is optimized for low-latency direct generation. In contrast, DeepSeek V3 focuses on standard fast inference.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between DeepSeek-V3-0324 and DeepSeek V3?+
DeepSeek-V3-0324 generates approximately 65 tokens per second, while DeepSeek V3 delivers 60 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, DeepSeek-V3-0324 provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining DeepSeek-V3-0324 and DeepSeek V3 to optimize costs?+
Yes! Tiered multi-model routing can optimize for latency and accuracy: you can route high-frequency conversational turns and latency-sensitive queries to DeepSeek-V3-0324, and route deep architectural or complex reasoning queries to DeepSeek-V3-0324. This balanced routing strategy maximizes system throughput and answer quality.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aya Vision 32B vs DeepSeek-V3-0324: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-4o: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 3.3 70B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fontes oficiais: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs